Factors Influencing Risky Driving Behavior Among Military Drivers: The Moderating Effect of Perceived ADAS Benefits

This study investigates the determinants of risky driving behavior among military drivers and examines the moderating role of perceived benefits of Advanced Driver Assistance Systems (ADAS) within an extended Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB) framework. Military driving is characterized by mission-oriented tasks, hierarchical decision-making, and frequent exposure to high-risk conditions; therefore, TPB-based findings from civilian contexts offer limited explanatory power for military drivers’ behavior. To address this limitation, the study incorporates risk sensitivity and aggressiveness as direct predictors, acknowledging that stable personality traits may exert immediate behavioral effects in demanding military environments. Survey data were collected from soldiers and officers with military driving experience, and structural equation modeling was conducted using SPSS 25.0 and AMOS 22.0. The results indicate that attitude, perceived behavioral control, and moral norm negatively influence risky driving intention, while intention positively predicts risky driving behavior. Risk sensitivity and aggressiveness also directly affect risky driving behavior. Furthermore, perceived benefits of ADAS strengthen the negative effects of TPB-related factors on risky driving intention, suggesting that favorable technology perceptions reinforce resistance to risky driving. Overall, this study integrates cognitive, dispositional, and technological factors into a unified framework and provides practical implications for military traffic safety policies beyond conventional training-based approaches.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Korean Management Science Review
Published
2025-12-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7737/kmsr.2025.42.4.163
Primary Topic
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Factors Influencing Risky Driving Behavior Among Military Drivers: The Moderating Effect of Perceived ADAS Benefits

Seung-Nyoung Baek, Jiye Jung
Korean Management Science Review
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
article

Factors Influencing Risky Driving Behavior Among Military Drivers: The Moderating Effect of Perceived ADAS Benefits

Seung-Nyoung Baek, Jiye Jung
article en

Abstract

This study investigates the determinants of risky driving behavior among military drivers and examines the moderating role of perceived benefits of Advanced Driver Assistance Systems (ADAS) within an extended Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB) framework. Military driving is characterized by mission-oriented tasks, hierarchical decision-making, and frequent exposure to high-risk conditions; therefore, TPB-based findings from civilian contexts offer limited explanatory power for military drivers’ behavior. To address this limitation, the study incorporates risk sensitivity and aggressiveness as direct predictors, acknowledging that stable personality traits may exert immediate behavioral effects in demanding military environments. Survey data were collected from soldiers and officers with military driving experience, and structural equation modeling was conducted using SPSS 25.0 and AMOS 22.0. The results indicate that attitude, perceived behavioral control, and moral norm negatively influence risky driving intention, while intention positively predicts risky driving behavior. Risk sensitivity and aggressiveness also directly affect risky driving behavior. Furthermore, perceived benefits of ADAS strengthen the negative effects of TPB-related factors on risky driving intention, suggesting that favorable technology perceptions reinforce resistance to risky driving. Overall, this study integrates cognitive, dispositional, and technological factors into a unified framework and provides practical implications for military traffic safety policies beyond conventional training-based approaches.

Korean Management Science ReviewVol. 42(4)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 22%
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.