Between protection and dependency: Rethinking IP harmonisation and innovation-driven FDI

This piece reflects the tensions between regional intellectual property (IP) harmonisation and innovation-driven foreign direct investment (FDI) in emerging economies. Rather than offering definitive answers or empirical analysis, it signals the complexity of aligning international IP norms with diverse national innovation ecosystems and their FDI attractiveness. This piece calls attention to critical legal systems theory, dependency theory, the capabilities approach, and innovation systems theory, but it does not claim to fully apply these frameworks on this occasion. It highlights their relevance instead as a preparation for the following research endeavours. Case insights from Chile, Brazil and Vietnam illustrate how harmonisation may reproduce asymmetries and sideline local actors. Therefore, there is no intention to turn this piece into a conclusive study. Instead, it is an invitation to rethink the politics of IP governance and develop a more nuanced, plural, and context-aware research agenda for emerging economies.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Bournemouth University Research Online (Bournemouth University)
Published
2025-04-15
Primary Topic
Intellectual Property and Patents
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Between protection and dependency: Rethinking IP harmonisation and innovation-driven FDI

Suelen Carls, M. Amal
Bournemouth University Research Online (Bournemouth University)
Intellectual Property and Patents
article

Between protection and dependency: Rethinking IP harmonisation and innovation-driven FDI

Suelen Carls, M. Amal
article en

Abstract

This piece reflects the tensions between regional intellectual property (IP) harmonisation and innovation-driven foreign direct investment (FDI) in emerging economies. Rather than offering definitive answers or empirical analysis, it signals the complexity of aligning international IP norms with diverse national innovation ecosystems and their FDI attractiveness. This piece calls attention to critical legal systems theory, dependency theory, the capabilities approach, and innovation systems theory, but it does not claim to fully apply these frameworks on this occasion. It highlights their relevance instead as a preparation for the following research endeavours. Case insights from Chile, Brazil and Vietnam illustrate how harmonisation may reproduce asymmetries and sideline local actors. Therefore, there is no intention to turn this piece into a conclusive study. Instead, it is an invitation to rethink the politics of IP governance and develop a more nuanced, plural, and context-aware research agenda for emerging economies.

Bournemouth University Research Online (Bournemouth University)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Intellectual Property and Patents
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.