Od ničnosti do niča

It is well-known that the Daoist tradition conceives the world as emerging from an unfathomable first principle called Dào 道 or wú 無. Early medieval thinkers and commentators such as Hé Yàn 何晏 and Wáng Bì 王弼 played a key role in the elaboration of this tenet. However, their views were challenged at an early date, especially by Guō Xiàng’s 郭象 influential reading of the Zhuāngzĭ 莊子. Moreover, since the early 20th century, scholars have stressed the originality of Guō Xiàng’s rejection of the onto-generative power of the Dào. However, even in recent scholarship, readers tend to refer to a selected set of passages from the Zhuāngzĭ Zhù 莊子注, and to focus mostly on doctrinal statements. By contrast, this study aims at exploring the exegetical and argumentative strategies by which Guō Xiàng establishes his understanding of Dào and wú. I intend to show that Guō Xiàng’s rejection is based on a reduction of the meaning of wú to its verbal use, and on what I will describe as a nominalist attitude in the Zhuāngzĭ Zhù. By doing so, this study shall provide new insights into Guō Xiàng’s worldview, and the ways in which he construes his core tenet, namely the idea that all the myriad things are self-so (zìrán 自然), self-generated (zìshēng 自生), and lone transforming (dúhuà 獨化).

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Repository of the University of Ljubljana (University of Ljubljana)
Published
2025-05-09
Primary Topic
Chinese history and philosophy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Od ničnosti do niča

Raphaël Van Daele
Repository of the University of Ljubljana (University of Ljubljana)
Chinese history and philosophy
article

Od ničnosti do niča

Raphaël Van Daele
article en

Abstract

It is well-known that the Daoist tradition conceives the world as emerging from an unfathomable first principle called Dào 道 or wú 無. Early medieval thinkers and commentators such as Hé Yàn 何晏 and Wáng Bì 王弼 played a key role in the elaboration of this tenet. However, their views were challenged at an early date, especially by Guō Xiàng’s 郭象 influential reading of the Zhuāngzĭ 莊子. Moreover, since the early 20th century, scholars have stressed the originality of Guō Xiàng’s rejection of the onto-generative power of the Dào. However, even in recent scholarship, readers tend to refer to a selected set of passages from the Zhuāngzĭ Zhù 莊子注, and to focus mostly on doctrinal statements. By contrast, this study aims at exploring the exegetical and argumentative strategies by which Guō Xiàng establishes his understanding of Dào and wú. I intend to show that Guō Xiàng’s rejection is based on a reduction of the meaning of wú to its verbal use, and on what I will describe as a nominalist attitude in the Zhuāngzĭ Zhù. By doing so, this study shall provide new insights into Guō Xiàng’s worldview, and the ways in which he construes his core tenet, namely the idea that all the myriad things are self-so (zìrán 自然), self-generated (zìshēng 自生), and lone transforming (dúhuà 獨化).

Repository of the University of Ljubljana (University of Ljubljana)
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Chinese history and philosophy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.