Perceived Corruption and Women’s Representation in the Executive Branch

Abstract This article looks at the effect of perceived corruption on women’s representation in the cabinet. Using a global dataset with data from 1992 to 2023, we report five findings. First, we confirm that perceived corruption makes it harder for women to access the cabinet. Second, we disconfirm that high corruption and low trust in democratic institutions entice heads of the government to nominate more women. Rather, we find a reversed relationship. Third, we find women do not see their chances of gaining nomination to a high-prestige portfolio diminish in countries with high levels of perceived corruption. Fourth, we report that trust in democratic institutions does not condition the effect of perceived corruption on the portfolio allocation of female ministers. Finally, we illustrate that change in corruption scores, either alone or in combination with trust, rather does not influence women’s nomination to cabinet.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Social Politics International Studies in Gender State & Society
Published
2025-11-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/sp/jxaf064
Primary Topic
Gender Politics and Representation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Perceived Corruption and Women’s Representation in the Executive Branch

Daniel Stockemer, Kamila Kolodziejczyk
Social Politics International Studies in Gender State & Society
Gender Politics and Representation
article

Perceived Corruption and Women’s Representation in the Executive Branch

Daniel Stockemer, Kamila Kolodziejczyk
article en

Abstract

Abstract This article looks at the effect of perceived corruption on women’s representation in the cabinet. Using a global dataset with data from 1992 to 2023, we report five findings. First, we confirm that perceived corruption makes it harder for women to access the cabinet. Second, we disconfirm that high corruption and low trust in democratic institutions entice heads of the government to nominate more women. Rather, we find a reversed relationship. Third, we find women do not see their chances of gaining nomination to a high-prestige portfolio diminish in countries with high levels of perceived corruption. Fourth, we report that trust in democratic institutions does not condition the effect of perceived corruption on the portfolio allocation of female ministers. Finally, we illustrate that change in corruption scores, either alone or in combination with trust, rather does not influence women’s nomination to cabinet.

Social Politics International Studies in Gender State & SocietyVol. 33(1)
University of Ottawa (CA), Ottawa University (US)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions, Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Gender Politics and Representation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Perceived Corruption and Women’s Representation in the Executive Branch — Daniel Stockemer, Kamila Kolodziejczyk · Social Politics International Studies in Gender State & Society (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS