THE NEGATIVE BASIS: BUY THE BOND OR SELL CREDIT DEFAULT SWAP PROTECTION?

The difference between the credit spread associated with a bond and the par spread associated with selling credit default swap (CDS) protection on the bond issuer is known as the bond’s negative basis. It is an important quantity for credit investors in order to decide whether it is more lucrative to buy a bond or to sell CDS protection. This definition, however, constitutes an inaccurate measurement devoid of a rigorous backing by classical arbitrage pricing theory, since it implicitly ignores the possibility of a credit event and also does not accurately take into account potential differences regarding the cash requirements of bond and CDS. We provide an accurate definition for the negative basis, generalizing an idea originated in [J.-F. Mai (2019) Pricing-hedging duality for credit default swaps and the negative basis arbitrage, International Journal of Theoretical and Applied Finance 22 (6), 1950032]. While the latter reference still hinges on a no arbitrage assumption in an implicit market model that is not always satisfied, we adopt a logic that is valid without restrictive assumptions but universally valid in practice. Our definition is shown to be identical in the case when the implicit no arbitrage assumption in [J.-F. Mai (2019) Pricing-hedging duality for credit default swaps and the negative basis arbitrage, International Journal of Theoretical and Applied Finance 22 (6), 1950032] happens to hold. We thereby complete a sound theoretical framework that clarifies and justifies how the negative basis must be defined. Furthermore, our framework is general enough to deal with discrete and floating rate bond coupons, and also adapts to the situation when bond and CDS have different currency denomination, so that all cases of practical relevance are included.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Theoretical and Applied Finance
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1142/s0219024926500020
Primary Topic
Credit Risk and Financial Regulations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

THE NEGATIVE BASIS: BUY THE BOND OR SELL CREDIT DEFAULT SWAP PROTECTION?

Jan-Frederik Mai, Niklas Knecht
International Journal of Theoretical and Applied Finance
Credit Risk and Financial Regulations
article

THE NEGATIVE BASIS: BUY THE BOND OR SELL CREDIT DEFAULT SWAP PROTECTION?

Jan-Frederik Mai, Niklas Knecht
article en

Abstract

The difference between the credit spread associated with a bond and the par spread associated with selling credit default swap (CDS) protection on the bond issuer is known as the bond’s negative basis. It is an important quantity for credit investors in order to decide whether it is more lucrative to buy a bond or to sell CDS protection. This definition, however, constitutes an inaccurate measurement devoid of a rigorous backing by classical arbitrage pricing theory, since it implicitly ignores the possibility of a credit event and also does not accurately take into account potential differences regarding the cash requirements of bond and CDS. We provide an accurate definition for the negative basis, generalizing an idea originated in [J.-F. Mai (2019) Pricing-hedging duality for credit default swaps and the negative basis arbitrage, International Journal of Theoretical and Applied Finance 22 (6), 1950032]. While the latter reference still hinges on a no arbitrage assumption in an implicit market model that is not always satisfied, we adopt a logic that is valid without restrictive assumptions but universally valid in practice. Our definition is shown to be identical in the case when the implicit no arbitrage assumption in [J.-F. Mai (2019) Pricing-hedging duality for credit default swaps and the negative basis arbitrage, International Journal of Theoretical and Applied Finance 22 (6), 1950032] happens to hold. We thereby complete a sound theoretical framework that clarifies and justifies how the negative basis must be defined. Furthermore, our framework is general enough to deal with discrete and floating rate bond coupons, and also adapts to the situation when bond and CDS have different currency denomination, so that all cases of practical relevance are included.

International Journal of Theoretical and Applied FinanceVol. 28(07n08)
Openalex Percentile: Top 23%
Credit Risk and Financial Regulations
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.