Focal Cryotherapy in Prostate Cancer. Does Gleason Impact Results?

PURPOSE: Focal cryotherapy is a minimally invasive treatment for localized prostate cancer (PCa), but its oncological outcomes, particularly in relation to baseline Gleason Grade Group (GG), remain understudied. This study evaluates its efficacy and the impact while radical of baseline Gleason score on recurrence-free survival. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis included 111 patients with localized PCa treated with focal cryotherapy between 2014 and January 2024. Patients with prior treatments or follow-up < 12 months were excluded. All patients underwent MRI and transperineal biopsy, and cryotherapy was performed using the Visual ICE Cryoablation System. Confirmatory biopsies were recommended at 12-24 months post-treatment. Recurrence was classified as either in-field (treated or adjacent areas) or out-field (non-adjacent areas). Any recurrence-free survival was defined as the absence of positive biopsy or additional treatment. Radical treatment-free survival was defined as the absence of whole-gland treatment (e.g., radical prostatectomy, radiotherapy), androgen deprivation therapy, metastasis, or death. Outcomes were compared between patients with baseline GG 1 and GG >1. RESULTS: Median follow-up was 35 months (IQR 24-49). Confirmatory biopsies were performed in 78% of patients (n=87), revealing in-field recurrence in 10% and out-field recurrence in 23%. There were no statistically significant differences between ISUP 1 and ISUP >1 groups in terms of protocol biopsy positivity for either in-field recurrence (HR 0.41; 95% CI 0.09-1.9) or out-field recurrence (HR 0.77; 95% CI 0.3-1.98). At three-years, the rates of any recurrence-free and radical treatment-free survival were 63% and 85%, respectively, with no significant variation by baseline GG. CONCLUSION: Focal cryotherapy provides favorable short-term oncological outcomes in localized PCa, with no significant differences in recurrence-free survival based on baseline Gleason score.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International braz j urol
Published
2026-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1590/s1677-5538.ibju.2025.0289
Primary Topic
Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Focal Cryotherapy in Prostate Cancer. Does Gleason Impact Results?

Paula Pelechano Gómez, Manel Beamud Cortés, Kinga Máté, Ana Calatrava Fons et al.
International braz j urol
Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
article

Focal Cryotherapy in Prostate Cancer. Does Gleason Impact Results?

Paula Pelechano Gómez, Manel Beamud Cortés, Kinga Máté, Ana Calatrava Fons, C. Gutiérrez Castañé, María Isabel Martín García, Javier Borja, Mario Roman, Victor Rodríguez Part, J. Patiño Aliaga, Á. Gómez-Ferrer Lozano, Jose Luis Dominguez Escrig S, Pedro de Pablos-Rodríguez, Ana Calatrava Fons, Marta Burbano Herraiz
article en

Abstract

PURPOSE: Focal cryotherapy is a minimally invasive treatment for localized prostate cancer (PCa), but its oncological outcomes, particularly in relation to baseline Gleason Grade Group (GG), remain understudied. This study evaluates its efficacy and the impact while radical of baseline Gleason score on recurrence-free survival. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis included 111 patients with localized PCa treated with focal cryotherapy between 2014 and January 2024. Patients with prior treatments or follow-up < 12 months were excluded. All patients underwent MRI and transperineal biopsy, and cryotherapy was performed using the Visual ICE Cryoablation System. Confirmatory biopsies were recommended at 12-24 months post-treatment. Recurrence was classified as either in-field (treated or adjacent areas) or out-field (non-adjacent areas). Any recurrence-free survival was defined as the absence of positive biopsy or additional treatment. Radical treatment-free survival was defined as the absence of whole-gland treatment (e.g., radical prostatectomy, radiotherapy), androgen deprivation therapy, metastasis, or death. Outcomes were compared between patients with baseline GG 1 and GG >1. RESULTS: Median follow-up was 35 months (IQR 24-49). Confirmatory biopsies were performed in 78% of patients (n=87), revealing in-field recurrence in 10% and out-field recurrence in 23%. There were no statistically significant differences between ISUP 1 and ISUP >1 groups in terms of protocol biopsy positivity for either in-field recurrence (HR 0.41; 95% CI 0.09-1.9) or out-field recurrence (HR 0.77; 95% CI 0.3-1.98). At three-years, the rates of any recurrence-free and radical treatment-free survival were 63% and 85%, respectively, with no significant variation by baseline GG. CONCLUSION: Focal cryotherapy provides favorable short-term oncological outcomes in localized PCa, with no significant differences in recurrence-free survival based on baseline Gleason score.

International braz j urolVol. 52(2)
Fundación Instituto Valenciano de Oncología (ES), Péterfy Sándor Utcai Kórház-Rendelőintézet és Baleseti Központ (HU), Hospital Universitario Miguel Servet (ES), Hospital Dipreca (CL), Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Pointe-à-Pitre (GP)
Openalex Percentile: Top 87%
Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.