Narrative Methodology to Examine Medical Students’ Experiences of Adverse Events

Background and Objectives: Clinically significant adverse events (CSAEs; eg, the death of a patient or a medical error) affect clinicians at all levels and can include stress, guilt, and doubt about abilities. The medical student experience may be different and could impact professional identity formation. We describe the use of narrative methodology as a research tool to understand complex life events and explore important themes in medical education. Methods: Key aspects of narrative methodology are described using an example of a research study that explored medical student experiences following a CSAE. We describe what constitutes narrative methodology, how narrative methodology is situated within a constructivist worldview, approaches for collecting and analyzing narrative data, metrics of research quality, and potential limitations to this methodology. Specifically, within the example case, we demonstrate how to use a holistic analytic lens and integrate themes across multiple stories. Results: Using narrative analysis is an important methodology that medical educators can use to explore deeply complex stories. Use of a holistic analytic lens allows for comparison across multiple stories and helps understand students’ experiences as well as their impact on professional identity formation. Conclusions: Incorporating narrative analysis into the medical education researcher’s toolbox has the potential to benefit participants and health systems by formulating answers to difficult questions, and improving education and student support through centering the stories of individual participants.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Family Medicine
Published
2026-01-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.22454/fammed.2026.911653
Primary Topic
Empathy and Medical Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Narrative Methodology to Examine Medical Students’ Experiences of Adverse Events

Monica A. Lutgendorf, Kirsten R. Brown, Paolo C. Martin, LaKesha N. Anderson
Family Medicine
Empathy and Medical Education
article

Narrative Methodology to Examine Medical Students’ Experiences of Adverse Events

Monica A. Lutgendorf, Kirsten R. Brown, Paolo C. Martin, LaKesha N. Anderson
article en

Abstract

Background and Objectives: Clinically significant adverse events (CSAEs; eg, the death of a patient or a medical error) affect clinicians at all levels and can include stress, guilt, and doubt about abilities. The medical student experience may be different and could impact professional identity formation. We describe the use of narrative methodology as a research tool to understand complex life events and explore important themes in medical education. Methods: Key aspects of narrative methodology are described using an example of a research study that explored medical student experiences following a CSAE. We describe what constitutes narrative methodology, how narrative methodology is situated within a constructivist worldview, approaches for collecting and analyzing narrative data, metrics of research quality, and potential limitations to this methodology. Specifically, within the example case, we demonstrate how to use a holistic analytic lens and integrate themes across multiple stories. Results: Using narrative analysis is an important methodology that medical educators can use to explore deeply complex stories. Use of a holistic analytic lens allows for comparison across multiple stories and helps understand students’ experiences as well as their impact on professional identity formation. Conclusions: Incorporating narrative analysis into the medical education researcher’s toolbox has the potential to benefit participants and health systems by formulating answers to difficult questions, and improving education and student support through centering the stories of individual participants.

Family MedicineVol. 58(2)
Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences (US)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 79%
Empathy and Medical Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.