Investing in Influence: Investors, Portfolio Firms, and Political Giving

Abstract We examine how the rise of institutional ownership has influenced firms’ political activities. We find that, after the acquisition of a large stake, a firm’s political action committee giving mirrors more closely that of the acquiring investor. Consistent with a causal interpretation, this pattern is also observed for acquisitions driven by new index inclusions. The pattern is stronger when firms’ management faces contentious proposals in shareholder meetings and may thus need institutional investors’ support. We further show that firms’ giving shifts away from business-relevant politicians and is strongly aligned with the individual campaign donations of the institutional investors’ employees. These results, together with the finding that the effects are larger for more “partisan” and privately owned investors, suggest that the influence we uncover is driven by institutional investors’ own political views, rather than a profit-maximizing strategy for the portfolio firms.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Review of Economic Studies
Published
2026-01-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/restud/rdag010
Primary Topic
Political Influence and Corporate Strategies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Investing in Influence: Investors, Portfolio Firms, and Political Giving

The Review of Economic Studies
Political Influence and Corporate Strategies
article

Investing in Influence: Investors, Portfolio Firms, and Political Giving

article en

Abstract

Abstract We examine how the rise of institutional ownership has influenced firms’ political activities. We find that, after the acquisition of a large stake, a firm’s political action committee giving mirrors more closely that of the acquiring investor. Consistent with a causal interpretation, this pattern is also observed for acquisitions driven by new index inclusions. The pattern is stronger when firms’ management faces contentious proposals in shareholder meetings and may thus need institutional investors’ support. We further show that firms’ giving shifts away from business-relevant politicians and is strongly aligned with the individual campaign donations of the institutional investors’ employees. These results, together with the finding that the effects are larger for more “partisan” and privately owned investors, suggest that the influence we uncover is driven by institutional investors’ own political views, rather than a profit-maximizing strategy for the portfolio firms.

The Review of Economic Studies
Boston University (US), Center for Economic and Policy Research (US), Hong Kong University of Science and Technology (HK)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 81%
Political Influence and Corporate Strategies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Investing in Influence: Investors, Portfolio Firms, and Political Giving · The Review of Economic Studies (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS