“Taller Fences or Longer Tables”: Should We Rely on Dynamic Security to Prevent Prison Violence?

Dynamic security has become the foundation of efforts to prevent violence in prisons around the world. This article discusses the meaning of the term and how it has been operationalized in practice, before identifying several issues that relate to when, where, and how it might be relied upon to support safer living and working environments. We conclude that, despite its presence in contemporary correctional policy and practice, dynamic security sits in a quasi-professional space without a clear governance approach (the absence of professional standards, regulation, and consistent training) which results in inconsistent application. Prison administrators will inevitably face significant obstacles in any efforts to introduce a culture that prioritizes dynamic security in the absence of ongoing research and practice development.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Prison Journal
Published
2026-01-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/00328855251413754
Primary Topic
Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

“Taller Fences or Longer Tables”: Should We Rely on Dynamic Security to Prevent Prison Violence?

Devon L. L. Polaschek, Michael Daffern, Armon J. Tamatea, Luke Butcher et al.
The Prison Journal
Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
article

“Taller Fences or Longer Tables”: Should We Rely on Dynamic Security to Prevent Prison Violence?

Devon L. L. Polaschek, Michael Daffern, Armon J. Tamatea, Luke Butcher, David Cooke, Andrew Day
article en

Abstract

Dynamic security has become the foundation of efforts to prevent violence in prisons around the world. This article discusses the meaning of the term and how it has been operationalized in practice, before identifying several issues that relate to when, where, and how it might be relied upon to support safer living and working environments. We conclude that, despite its presence in contemporary correctional policy and practice, dynamic security sits in a quasi-professional space without a clear governance approach (the absence of professional standards, regulation, and consistent training) which results in inconsistent application. Prison administrators will inevitably face significant obstacles in any efforts to introduce a culture that prioritizes dynamic security in the absence of ongoing research and practice development.

The Prison JournalVol. 106(2)
The University of Melbourne (AU), Charles Darwin University (AU), University of Waikato (NZ), Swinburne University of Technology (AU)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 82%
Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.