Game-Based Learning Approach to Enhance Tactical Understanding and Motivation in School Football Physical Education

Background: Traditional football teaching in school physical education often emphasizes technical drills and skill repetition, which can lead to reduced student engagement and limited development of tactical understanding. Game-Based Learning (GBL), particularly through the Teaching Games for Understanding (TGfU) model, offers an alternative approach that prioritizes tactical awareness and decision-making within authentic game contexts. Purpose: This quasi-experimental study examined the effectiveness of a GBL approach in improving tactical understanding and intrinsic motivation among secondary school students in football physical education classes in Kabupaten Dompu, Nusa Tenggara Barat, Indonesia. Methods: Eighty-four students (mean age = 14.6 ± 1.2 years; 52 males, 32 females) from two secondary schools participated in an 8-week intervention (16 sessions, 2×/week). The experimental group (n=42) received GBL-based instruction using modified small-sided games and tactical questioning, while the control group (n=42) followed traditional skill-drill methods. Tactical understanding was assessed using the Game Performance Assessment Instrument (GPAI), and motivation was measured using the Sport Motivation Scale (SMS) adapted for physical education. Data were analyzed using paired t-tests, ANCOVA, and Cohen's d effect sizes. Results: The GBL group demonstrated significantly greater improvements in tactical understanding (decision-making: 42.3%; skill execution: 31.8%; support: 38.5%) compared to the control group (15.2%, 18.4%, 12.7% respectively; all p < 0.001). Regarding motivation, the GBL group showed significant increases in intrinsic motivation (d = 1.24, p < 0.001), identified regulation (d = 0.89, p < 0.001), and decreased amotivation (d = -1.02, p < 0.001), while the control group showed minimal changes. ANCOVA revealed significant between-group differences favoring GBL on all measures (F-values ranging from 32.45 to 58.72, all p < 0.001, partial η² = 0.28-0.42). Conclusions: The GBL approach using TGfU principles significantly enhanced both tactical understanding and autonomous motivation in secondary school football education. These findings support the implementation of game-centered pedagogies in Indonesian physical education contexts and suggest that GBL may address common challenges of student disengagement in traditional skill-focused instruction. Future research should explore long-term retention effects and implementation across diverse cultural and educational settings.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
INSPIREE Indonesian Sport Innovation Review
Published
2026-01-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.53905/inspiree.v7i01.163
Primary Topic
Physical Education and Pedagogy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Game-Based Learning Approach to Enhance Tactical Understanding and Motivation in School Football Physical Education

Sandi Ahmad Pratama, Erika Mc Clintock, Linda Susila
INSPIREE Indonesian Sport Innovation Review
Physical Education and Pedagogy
article

Game-Based Learning Approach to Enhance Tactical Understanding and Motivation in School Football Physical Education

Sandi Ahmad Pratama, Erika Mc Clintock, Linda Susila
article en

Abstract

Background: Traditional football teaching in school physical education often emphasizes technical drills and skill repetition, which can lead to reduced student engagement and limited development of tactical understanding. Game-Based Learning (GBL), particularly through the Teaching Games for Understanding (TGfU) model, offers an alternative approach that prioritizes tactical awareness and decision-making within authentic game contexts. Purpose: This quasi-experimental study examined the effectiveness of a GBL approach in improving tactical understanding and intrinsic motivation among secondary school students in football physical education classes in Kabupaten Dompu, Nusa Tenggara Barat, Indonesia. Methods: Eighty-four students (mean age = 14.6 ± 1.2 years; 52 males, 32 females) from two secondary schools participated in an 8-week intervention (16 sessions, 2×/week). The experimental group (n=42) received GBL-based instruction using modified small-sided games and tactical questioning, while the control group (n=42) followed traditional skill-drill methods. Tactical understanding was assessed using the Game Performance Assessment Instrument (GPAI), and motivation was measured using the Sport Motivation Scale (SMS) adapted for physical education. Data were analyzed using paired t-tests, ANCOVA, and Cohen's d effect sizes. Results: The GBL group demonstrated significantly greater improvements in tactical understanding (decision-making: 42.3%; skill execution: 31.8%; support: 38.5%) compared to the control group (15.2%, 18.4%, 12.7% respectively; all p < 0.001). Regarding motivation, the GBL group showed significant increases in intrinsic motivation (d = 1.24, p < 0.001), identified regulation (d = 0.89, p < 0.001), and decreased amotivation (d = -1.02, p < 0.001), while the control group showed minimal changes. ANCOVA revealed significant between-group differences favoring GBL on all measures (F-values ranging from 32.45 to 58.72, all p < 0.001, partial η² = 0.28-0.42). Conclusions: The GBL approach using TGfU principles significantly enhanced both tactical understanding and autonomous motivation in secondary school football education. These findings support the implementation of game-centered pedagogies in Indonesian physical education contexts and suggest that GBL may address common challenges of student disengagement in traditional skill-focused instruction. Future research should explore long-term retention effects and implementation across diverse cultural and educational settings.

INSPIREE Indonesian Sport Innovation ReviewVol. 7(01)
Openalex Percentile: Top 83%
Physical Education and Pedagogy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.