Kinematic Assessment of Upper Limb Impairment in Stroke Survivors Through IMUs During Box and Block Test

Motor deficits requiring clinical evaluation are common in stroke survivors. The aim of this study is to find kinematic indices for the objective assessment of stroke-related motor impairment during the box and block test (BBT). We tracked the movement of the trunk, pelvis, and upper limb during the test using eight inertial measurement units (IMUs). Two groups of subjects were involved: ten stroke survivors (53.6 ± 19.8 years) with different levels of motor disability (Upper Extremity Fugl-Meyer score of 54.4 ± 6.4), and 14 healthy subjects (43.6 ± 15.3 years). The data obtained were processed using validated procedure. The BBT task was divided into three subphases: reach, transfer, and coming back. The dominant side of healthy subjects, the affected and the unaffected sides of patients were compared in terms of the calculated indices by means of Kruskal–Wallis test. As expected, significant differences were found between the dominant side of the control group and the affected side of patients (p < 0.05). Most significant differences were found in parameters related to hand kinematics. A significant strong correlation (rs) was found between the mean value of the indices and the score that patients achieved in the BBT (0.6 < |rs| < 0.8 and p < 0.05). The study of the entire kinematic chain of pelvis, trunk, and upper limb revealed a compensation strategy used by stroke patients.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
IEEE Sensors Journal
Published
2026-01-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/jsen.2026.3651335
Primary Topic
Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Kinematic Assessment of Upper Limb Impairment in Stroke Survivors Through IMUs During Box and Block Test

Zaccaria Del Prete, Floriana Pichiorri, Emma Colamarino, Ilaria Conforti et al.
IEEE Sensors Journal
Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
article

Kinematic Assessment of Upper Limb Impairment in Stroke Survivors Through IMUs During Box and Block Test

Zaccaria Del Prete, Floriana Pichiorri, Emma Colamarino, Ilaria Conforti, Ilaria Mileti, Valeria de Seta, Eduardo Palermo, J. Toppi, Luca Mattioli, Donatella Mattia, Febo Cincotti
article en

Abstract

Motor deficits requiring clinical evaluation are common in stroke survivors. The aim of this study is to find kinematic indices for the objective assessment of stroke-related motor impairment during the box and block test (BBT). We tracked the movement of the trunk, pelvis, and upper limb during the test using eight inertial measurement units (IMUs). Two groups of subjects were involved: ten stroke survivors (53.6 ± 19.8 years) with different levels of motor disability (Upper Extremity Fugl-Meyer score of 54.4 ± 6.4), and 14 healthy subjects (43.6 ± 15.3 years). The data obtained were processed using validated procedure. The BBT task was divided into three subphases: reach, transfer, and coming back. The dominant side of healthy subjects, the affected and the unaffected sides of patients were compared in terms of the calculated indices by means of Kruskal–Wallis test. As expected, significant differences were found between the dominant side of the control group and the affected side of patients (p < 0.05). Most significant differences were found in parameters related to hand kinematics. A significant strong correlation (rs) was found between the mean value of the indices and the score that patients achieved in the BBT (0.6 < |rs| < 0.8 and p < 0.05). The study of the entire kinematic chain of pelvis, trunk, and upper limb revealed a compensation strategy used by stroke patients.

IEEE Sensors JournalVol. 26(5)
Fondazione Santa Lucia (IT), École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (CH), Sapienza University of Rome (IT)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 79%
Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.