Exploring Non-University Doctoral Alternatives for Scholar‑Practitioners: An Autoethnographic Account
This paper explores non-university doctoral qualifications as an alternative doctoral pathway for scholar practitioners and industry professionals transitioning into academia. Through an autoethnographic approach, the author reflects on their personal journey pursuing a UK-based Level 8 diploma, providing an insider perspective on motivations, barriers, and perceptions encountered. The study reveals limited awareness and academic bias against these qualifications, despite their flexible, practice-oriented design that aligns well with the needs of mid-career professionals. Findings highlight the potential of non-university doctoral qualifications to support professional development, also identifying the need for greater standardisation to improve their legitimacy and comparability with traditional doctorates such as the PhD and DBA. This work contributes original insight into a rarely examined doctoral route, broadening discussions around professional doctorates and advocating for inclusive academic recognition of industry-informed expertise. By linking lived experience with broader educational structures, the study challenges dominant credential norms and calls for cultural shifts in academic perception.
Authors
- Kieron Chadwick (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1547-6808)
Institutions
- University of Staffordshire (GB)
Publication Details
- Journal
- The Journal of Macrodynamic Analysis (Memorial University of Newfoundland)
- Published
- 2025-05-24
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.82396/cjcd.v25i1.3283
- Primary Topic
- Doctoral Education Challenges and Solutions
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00