Always Two There Are? The Combined Dragon in Job 40:15–41:26 LXX

Abstract In this article, I examine the portrayal of Behemoth and Leviathan in the Septuagint version of Job 40:15–41:26, arguing that the translation merges the two creatures into a single entity: the δράκων (“dragon”). While traditionally, the term δράκων has been considered a reference only to the Hebrew text’s “Leviathan” pericope (Job 40:25–41:26), I contend that the translation seems to extend the δράκων into the preceding “Behemoth” passage in the Hebrew (Job 40:15–24), absorbing all its characteristics into the singular δράκων. Analysis of the key lines of the pericope in the Septuagint of Job (LXX Job) reveals certain features, such as syntactical uniformity, use of inclusios, and consistent descriptions of a serpentine creature, which align more with a single creature, the δράκων, than two different animals. Moving beyond LXX Job, the later portrayal of the δράκων in 3 Baruch may better reflect the unified δράκων of LXX Job. Overall, I challenge the traditional (dichotomous) reading of Behemoth and Leviathan in LXX Job, emphasizing the translation’s—and ultimately the creature’s—literary unity.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Biblical Literature
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.15699/jbl.1444.2025.6
Primary Topic
Biblical Studies and Interpretation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Always Two There Are? The Combined Dragon in Job 40:15–41:26 LXX

James Culver Wykes
Journal of Biblical Literature
Biblical Studies and Interpretation
article

Always Two There Are? The Combined Dragon in Job 40:15–41:26 LXX

James Culver Wykes
article en

Abstract

Abstract In this article, I examine the portrayal of Behemoth and Leviathan in the Septuagint version of Job 40:15–41:26, arguing that the translation merges the two creatures into a single entity: the δράκων (“dragon”). While traditionally, the term δράκων has been considered a reference only to the Hebrew text’s “Leviathan” pericope (Job 40:25–41:26), I contend that the translation seems to extend the δράκων into the preceding “Behemoth” passage in the Hebrew (Job 40:15–24), absorbing all its characteristics into the singular δράκων. Analysis of the key lines of the pericope in the Septuagint of Job (LXX Job) reveals certain features, such as syntactical uniformity, use of inclusios, and consistent descriptions of a serpentine creature, which align more with a single creature, the δράκων, than two different animals. Moving beyond LXX Job, the later portrayal of the δράκων in 3 Baruch may better reflect the unified δράκων of LXX Job. Overall, I challenge the traditional (dichotomous) reading of Behemoth and Leviathan in LXX Job, emphasizing the translation’s—and ultimately the creature’s—literary unity.

Journal of Biblical LiteratureVol. 144(4)
Christian Brothers University (US)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Biblical Studies and Interpretation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.