A Comparison of Participant Demographics Across Co-Designed Recruitment Methods to Two Student Mental Health Trials: Cross-Sectional Observational Study

Our study describes how different recruitment approaches influence participant characteristics in clinical trials and highlights challenges in implementing a co-designed recruitment strategy in a university setting. This contributes to the field by providing research evidence on the efficacy of different recruitment strategies for planning future trials. Our key real-world recommendation is to allow time and resources for planning multiple recruitment strategies to ensure a diverse range of participants take part in research.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
JMIR Formative Research
Published
2026-01-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2196/76018
Primary Topic
Ethics in Clinical Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Comparison of Participant Demographics Across Co-Designed Recruitment Methods to Two Student Mental Health Trials: Cross-Sectional Observational Study

Jemima Dooley, Alanis Whitmore, Ella Gillett, Ed Watkins
JMIR Formative Research
Ethics in Clinical Research
article

A Comparison of Participant Demographics Across Co-Designed Recruitment Methods to Two Student Mental Health Trials: Cross-Sectional Observational Study

Jemima Dooley, Alanis Whitmore, Ella Gillett, Ed Watkins
article en

Abstract

Our study describes how different recruitment approaches influence participant characteristics in clinical trials and highlights challenges in implementing a co-designed recruitment strategy in a university setting. This contributes to the field by providing research evidence on the efficacy of different recruitment strategies for planning future trials. Our key real-world recommendation is to allow time and resources for planning multiple recruitment strategies to ensure a diverse range of participants take part in research.

JMIR Formative ResearchVol. 10
University of Exeter (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 80%
Ethics in Clinical Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.