A Human-Centered Visual Cognitive Framework for Traffic Pair Crossing Identification in Human–Machine Teaming

Human–machine teaming (HMT) in air traffic management (ATM) promises safer, more efficient operations by combining human expertise in decision-making with machine efficiency in data processing, where traffic pair crossing identification is crucial for effective conflict detection and resolution by recognizing aircraft pairs that may lead to conflict. To facilitate this goal, this paper presents a four-phase cognitive framework to enhance HMT for monitoring traffic pairs at crossing points through a human-centered, visual-based approach. The visual cognitive framework integrates three data streams—eye-tracking metrics, mouse-over actions, and issued radar commands—to capture the traffic context from the controller’s perspective. A target pair identification method is designed to generate potential conflict pairs. Controller behavior is then modeled using a sighting timeline, yielding insights to develop the cognitive mechanism. Using air traffic crossing-conflict monitoring in en route airspace as a case study, the framework successfully captures the state of controllers’ monitoring and awareness behavior through tests on five target flight pairs under various crossing conditions. Specifically, aware monitoring activities are characterized by higher fixation count on either flight across a 10 min window, with 53% to 100% of visual input activities occurring between 8 to 7 and 3 to 2 min before crossing, ensuring timely conflict management. Furthermore, the study quantifies the effect of crossing geometry, whereby narrow-angle crossings (21 degrees) require significantly higher monitoring intensity (15 paired sightings) compared to wide or moderate angle crossings. These results indicate that controllers exhibit distinct monitoring and awareness behaviors when identifying and managing conflicts across the different test pairs, demonstrating the effectiveness and applicability of the proposed visual cognitive framework.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Electronics
Published
2026-01-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics15020477
Primary Topic
Air Traffic Management and Optimization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Human-Centered Visual Cognitive Framework for Traffic Pair Crossing Identification in Human–Machine Teaming

Hong Jie Wee, Sun Woh Lye, Bufan Liu, Terry Liang Khin Teo
Electronics
Air Traffic Management and Optimization
article

A Human-Centered Visual Cognitive Framework for Traffic Pair Crossing Identification in Human–Machine Teaming

Hong Jie Wee, Sun Woh Lye, Bufan Liu, Terry Liang Khin Teo
article en

Abstract

Human–machine teaming (HMT) in air traffic management (ATM) promises safer, more efficient operations by combining human expertise in decision-making with machine efficiency in data processing, where traffic pair crossing identification is crucial for effective conflict detection and resolution by recognizing aircraft pairs that may lead to conflict. To facilitate this goal, this paper presents a four-phase cognitive framework to enhance HMT for monitoring traffic pairs at crossing points through a human-centered, visual-based approach. The visual cognitive framework integrates three data streams—eye-tracking metrics, mouse-over actions, and issued radar commands—to capture the traffic context from the controller’s perspective. A target pair identification method is designed to generate potential conflict pairs. Controller behavior is then modeled using a sighting timeline, yielding insights to develop the cognitive mechanism. Using air traffic crossing-conflict monitoring in en route airspace as a case study, the framework successfully captures the state of controllers’ monitoring and awareness behavior through tests on five target flight pairs under various crossing conditions. Specifically, aware monitoring activities are characterized by higher fixation count on either flight across a 10 min window, with 53% to 100% of visual input activities occurring between 8 to 7 and 3 to 2 min before crossing, ensuring timely conflict management. Furthermore, the study quantifies the effect of crossing geometry, whereby narrow-angle crossings (21 degrees) require significantly higher monitoring intensity (15 paired sightings) compared to wide or moderate angle crossings. These results indicate that controllers exhibit distinct monitoring and awareness behaviors when identifying and managing conflicts across the different test pairs, demonstrating the effectiveness and applicability of the proposed visual cognitive framework.

ElectronicsVol. 15(2)
Nanyang Technological University (SG)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 82%
Air Traffic Management and Optimization
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.