Can generative artificial intelligence identify case-law rendered vulnerable by the Revocation Act 2023?

Abstract Parts of domestic UK case-law rely in one way or another on European Union (EU) law. The authority of such precedent has potentially been greatly diminished by the Retained EU Law (Revocation and Reform) Act 2023. This study investigates whether the Large Language Model (LLM) ChatGPT-4o is capable of reliably distinguishing judgments where the ratio turns on direct effect or conforming interpretation from those where it does not. It finds that, given a specific prompt, ChatGPT masters the task with a reliability of more than 90 per cent. This result may be an indicator that LLMs can, more broadly, play a productive role in the legal field for the purpose of identifying risks and weaknesses in legal reasoning.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Statute Law Review
Published
2025-12-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/slr/hmaf039
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Law
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Can generative artificial intelligence identify case-law rendered vulnerable by the Revocation Act 2023?

Fabian Barth
Statute Law Review
Artificial Intelligence in Law
article

Can generative artificial intelligence identify case-law rendered vulnerable by the Revocation Act 2023?

Fabian Barth
article en

Abstract

Abstract Parts of domestic UK case-law rely in one way or another on European Union (EU) law. The authority of such precedent has potentially been greatly diminished by the Retained EU Law (Revocation and Reform) Act 2023. This study investigates whether the Large Language Model (LLM) ChatGPT-4o is capable of reliably distinguishing judgments where the ratio turns on direct effect or conforming interpretation from those where it does not. It finds that, given a specific prompt, ChatGPT masters the task with a reliability of more than 90 per cent. This result may be an indicator that LLMs can, more broadly, play a productive role in the legal field for the purpose of identifying risks and weaknesses in legal reasoning.

Statute Law ReviewVol. 47(1)
University of Lapland (FI)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Artificial Intelligence in Law
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.