Performance comparison of two-, three- and four-coil e-textile wireless power transfer systems

Magnetically coupled resonant wireless power transfer (MR-WPT) can efficiently power e-textile systems. Different coil configurations (2, 3 and 4-coil structures) were investigated using planar textile coils of size 14.5 x 15 cm fabricated on cotton substrates using an embroidery process whereby silk-coated copper Litz wire forms the conductive track. For each configuration, the efficiency of the MR-WPT has been explored at different separation distances, misalignments and when subject to bending. The results show that the 2-coil structure was the most efficient at short distances (below 10 cm). However, the 4-coil system has the best performance at distances over 11 cm and when subject to axial misalignment, variations in coil orientation and when the coils are deformed by bending. The planar 4-coil configuration is therefore recommended for use in most practical applications. The coils were wash tested, and whilst they continue to function up to 15 wash cycles, performance does deteriorate due to a change in the coil properties. The coils can withstand 1000 bending cycles but there is a drop in performance of 43% in power transfer efficiency due to increasing coil resistance. Performance over longer separation distances is limited due to the properties of textile coils.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
ePrints Soton (University of Southampton)
Published
2025-12-12
Primary Topic
Wireless Power Transfer Systems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Performance comparison of two-, three- and four-coil e-textile wireless power transfer systems

Nick Harris, Steve Beeby, Yixuan Sun, Sheng Yong
ePrints Soton (University of Southampton)
Wireless Power Transfer Systems
article

Performance comparison of two-, three- and four-coil e-textile wireless power transfer systems

Nick Harris, Steve Beeby, Yixuan Sun, Sheng Yong
article en

Abstract

Magnetically coupled resonant wireless power transfer (MR-WPT) can efficiently power e-textile systems. Different coil configurations (2, 3 and 4-coil structures) were investigated using planar textile coils of size 14.5 x 15 cm fabricated on cotton substrates using an embroidery process whereby silk-coated copper Litz wire forms the conductive track. For each configuration, the efficiency of the MR-WPT has been explored at different separation distances, misalignments and when subject to bending. The results show that the 2-coil structure was the most efficient at short distances (below 10 cm). However, the 4-coil system has the best performance at distances over 11 cm and when subject to axial misalignment, variations in coil orientation and when the coils are deformed by bending. The planar 4-coil configuration is therefore recommended for use in most practical applications. The coils were wash tested, and whilst they continue to function up to 15 wash cycles, performance does deteriorate due to a change in the coil properties. The coils can withstand 1000 bending cycles but there is a drop in performance of 43% in power transfer efficiency due to increasing coil resistance. Performance over longer separation distances is limited due to the properties of textile coils.

ePrints Soton (University of Southampton)
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 38%
Wireless Power Transfer Systems
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Performance comparison of two-, three- and four-coil e-textile wireless power transfer systems — Nick Harris, Steve Beeby, et al. · ePrints Soton (University of Southampton) (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS