Trump’s Executions, Biden’s Commutations, and Federalism

Abstract During his first term, President Donald Trump executed thirteen federal prisoners. At the end of his own presidency, Joe Biden commuted the death sentences of thirty-seven federal inmates, reducing them to life in prison without the possibility of parole. Most commentators have focused on how Trump’s action reflects his support for the death penalty and Biden’s shows his opposition to it. But the better question to ask is what the contrast says about the federal death penalty in particular. This article argues that the Biden commutations (and in particular the nature of the three death sentences that were left untouched) reflect a coherent conception of the federal death penalty as being limited to terrorism and civil rights murders, rare cases in which there is a compelling national stake in an execution. By contrast, the Trump executions represent a model in which the U.S. government uses the death penalty so indiscriminately that it becomes divorced from the federalist foundations of the criminal justice system. This juxtaposition has fruitful implications for the broader ongoing debate about the federal government’s role in punishing crime as compared to the states.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Federal Sentencing Reporter
Published
2026-01-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1215/10539867-12110832
Primary Topic
Torture, Ethics, and Law
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Trump’s Executions, Biden’s Commutations, and Federalism

Jonah J. Horwitz
Federal Sentencing Reporter
Torture, Ethics, and Law
article

Trump’s Executions, Biden’s Commutations, and Federalism

Jonah J. Horwitz
article en

Abstract

Abstract During his first term, President Donald Trump executed thirteen federal prisoners. At the end of his own presidency, Joe Biden commuted the death sentences of thirty-seven federal inmates, reducing them to life in prison without the possibility of parole. Most commentators have focused on how Trump’s action reflects his support for the death penalty and Biden’s shows his opposition to it. But the better question to ask is what the contrast says about the federal death penalty in particular. This article argues that the Biden commutations (and in particular the nature of the three death sentences that were left untouched) reflect a coherent conception of the federal death penalty as being limited to terrorism and civil rights murders, rare cases in which there is a compelling national stake in an execution. By contrast, the Trump executions represent a model in which the U.S. government uses the death penalty so indiscriminately that it becomes divorced from the federalist foundations of the criminal justice system. This juxtaposition has fruitful implications for the broader ongoing debate about the federal government’s role in punishing crime as compared to the states.

Federal Sentencing ReporterVol. 38(1)
University of Idaho (US)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 82%
Torture, Ethics, and Law
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.