Practical Optimized Trusses via a Combined Ground Structure Approach and Metaheuristic Algorithms

Abstract This study introduces an alternative ground structure approach for minimum volume layout optimization of steel trusses using metaheuristic algorithms. Traditional methods, such as the Ground Structure Method, often yield overly complex solutions that are impractical for real‐world construction. The new method, on the other hand, takes a simplified mesh as a starting point and optimizes node positions, thus producing more practical solutions while the additional cost in material usage is marginal. Three metaheuristic search algorithms — a Genetic Algorithm, Particle Swarm Optimization, and Simulated Annealing — are evaluated in this context. Particle Swarm Optimization demonstrated superior performance among the considered algorithms, achieving lower material volumes in complex scenarios and converging faster than Genetic Algorithms and Simulated Annealing.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ce/papers
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/cepa.70115
Primary Topic
Topology Optimization in Engineering
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Practical Optimized Trusses via a Combined Ground Structure Approach and Metaheuristic Algorithms

Jurgen Becque, Daniel Dalton
ce/papers
Topology Optimization in Engineering
article

Practical Optimized Trusses via a Combined Ground Structure Approach and Metaheuristic Algorithms

Jurgen Becque, Daniel Dalton
article en

Abstract

Abstract This study introduces an alternative ground structure approach for minimum volume layout optimization of steel trusses using metaheuristic algorithms. Traditional methods, such as the Ground Structure Method, often yield overly complex solutions that are impractical for real‐world construction. The new method, on the other hand, takes a simplified mesh as a starting point and optimizes node positions, thus producing more practical solutions while the additional cost in material usage is marginal. Three metaheuristic search algorithms — a Genetic Algorithm, Particle Swarm Optimization, and Simulated Annealing — are evaluated in this context. Particle Swarm Optimization demonstrated superior performance among the considered algorithms, achieving lower material volumes in complex scenarios and converging faster than Genetic Algorithms and Simulated Annealing.

ce/papersVol. 8(6)
University of Cambridge (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 33%
Topology Optimization in Engineering
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.