Strain Limit in Structural Steel Joint Analysis

Abstract Inelastic numerical analysis is a classic method in engineering practice. Failure criteria are primarily expressed in terms of plastic strain limits. Several factors influence the plastic strain limit, including material properties, element geometry, numerical element type, mesh density, and constitutive relations. Component‐Based Finite Element Method (CBFEM) is a widely used technique for the design of steel connections. It combines the analytical component method with the numerical finite element method (FEM). FEM is used to determine the distribution of internal forces, and plates are modeled using 4‐node shell elements. Connection components are replaced by dependent nonlinear springs and analysis models derived from their specific behavior. This paper presents the results of determining the plastic strain limit for CBFEM numerical calculations. The limit is presented as a reduced value of the ultimate strain. The partial safety factor was determined for nine geometries of weakened plates based on design values obtained from Monte Carlo simulation and reliability analysis. The Monte Carlo simulation was performed using a combination of FEM analysis and analytical formulas implemented in Python. The plastic strain limit was found to be 4.77% over all mesh densities.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ce/papers
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/cepa.70176
Primary Topic
Structural Load-Bearing Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Strain Limit in Structural Steel Joint Analysis

Martin Vild, František Wald, Kirill Golubiatnikov
ce/papers
Structural Load-Bearing Analysis
article

Strain Limit in Structural Steel Joint Analysis

Martin Vild, František Wald, Kirill Golubiatnikov
article en

Abstract

Abstract Inelastic numerical analysis is a classic method in engineering practice. Failure criteria are primarily expressed in terms of plastic strain limits. Several factors influence the plastic strain limit, including material properties, element geometry, numerical element type, mesh density, and constitutive relations. Component‐Based Finite Element Method (CBFEM) is a widely used technique for the design of steel connections. It combines the analytical component method with the numerical finite element method (FEM). FEM is used to determine the distribution of internal forces, and plates are modeled using 4‐node shell elements. Connection components are replaced by dependent nonlinear springs and analysis models derived from their specific behavior. This paper presents the results of determining the plastic strain limit for CBFEM numerical calculations. The limit is presented as a reduced value of the ultimate strain. The partial safety factor was determined for nine geometries of weakened plates based on design values obtained from Monte Carlo simulation and reliability analysis. The Monte Carlo simulation was performed using a combination of FEM analysis and analytical formulas implemented in Python. The plastic strain limit was found to be 4.77% over all mesh densities.

ce/papersVol. 8(6)
Czech Technical University in Prague (CZ), Brno University of Technology (CZ)
Openalex Percentile: Top 33%
Structural Load-Bearing Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.