How do core surface flow models vary when inverted from IGRF-14 candidate field models?

Abstract The International Geomagnetic Reference Field (IGRF) model is a series of models that describe the large scale magnetic field measured at the Earth’s surface. It is used by a wide range of scientists and industries, including in navigation, space weather applications, and resource exploration. The 14th generation, IGRF-14, is the result of an international collaboration over 19 different lead research groups. This new generation provides a definitive model of the main magnetic field (MF) for the epoch 2020.0, a prediction of the MF for 2025.0, and a predicted average annual time variation of the magnetic field for 2025.0 $$-$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mo>-</mml:mo> </mml:math> 2030.0. The first time derivative of the magnetic field, known as secular variation, (SV) is linked to the flow at the top of Earth’s outer core. As such, the ensemble of IGRF-14 candidate models can be used to investigate predicted core flow variability between 2020.0 and 2030.0. We use the Python package using the AR-1 ‘dense’ methodology, the 71% geodynamo prior, and keep all inversion parameters fixed to ensure that differences in inferred flow arise solely from variations from the IGRF candidate models. Our results demonstrate that while all candidates produce broadly similar flow spectra for all degrees, candidates that deviate most from the median IGRF model also show the largest differences in flow. In all cases, the flow speed difference remains below 25% of the maximum flow speed of the Huber-weighted mean model in space, with most discrepancies occurring at small spatial scales. The greatest flow uncertainty appears over the Pacific and in the polar regions, where constraints are weaker. Finally, we assess the impact of the maximum spherical harmonic degree truncation of the SV candidate models by comparing two SV candidates truncated at spherical harmonic degree 13 instead of 8. Increasing the truncation degree of SV alters the flow spectral energy at all degrees and increases the maximum flow speed by up to 31%, despite the flow maps remaining highly correlated. This study supports the idea of raising the spherical harmonic truncation degree to 13 for the SV prediction component of the IGRF. Graphical Abstract

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Earth Planets and Space
Published
2026-01-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40623-025-02307-5
Primary Topic
Geomagnetism and Paleomagnetism Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

How do core surface flow models vary when inverted from IGRF-14 candidate field models?

H. F. Rogers, M. Mandea
Earth Planets and Space
Geomagnetism and Paleomagnetism Studies
article

How do core surface flow models vary when inverted from IGRF-14 candidate field models?

H. F. Rogers, M. Mandea
article en

Abstract

Abstract The International Geomagnetic Reference Field (IGRF) model is a series of models that describe the large scale magnetic field measured at the Earth’s surface. It is used by a wide range of scientists and industries, including in navigation, space weather applications, and resource exploration. The 14th generation, IGRF-14, is the result of an international collaboration over 19 different lead research groups. This new generation provides a definitive model of the main magnetic field (MF) for the epoch 2020.0, a prediction of the MF for 2025.0, and a predicted average annual time variation of the magnetic field for 2025.0 $$-$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mo>-</mml:mo> </mml:math> 2030.0. The first time derivative of the magnetic field, known as secular variation, (SV) is linked to the flow at the top of Earth’s outer core. As such, the ensemble of IGRF-14 candidate models can be used to investigate predicted core flow variability between 2020.0 and 2030.0. We use the Python package using the AR-1 ‘dense’ methodology, the 71% geodynamo prior, and keep all inversion parameters fixed to ensure that differences in inferred flow arise solely from variations from the IGRF candidate models. Our results demonstrate that while all candidates produce broadly similar flow spectra for all degrees, candidates that deviate most from the median IGRF model also show the largest differences in flow. In all cases, the flow speed difference remains below 25% of the maximum flow speed of the Huber-weighted mean model in space, with most discrepancies occurring at small spatial scales. The greatest flow uncertainty appears over the Pacific and in the polar regions, where constraints are weaker. Finally, we assess the impact of the maximum spherical harmonic degree truncation of the SV candidate models by comparing two SV candidates truncated at spherical harmonic degree 13 instead of 8. Increasing the truncation degree of SV alters the flow spectral energy at all degrees and increases the maximum flow speed by up to 31%, despite the flow maps remaining highly correlated. This study supports the idea of raising the spherical harmonic truncation degree to 13 for the SV prediction component of the IGRF. Graphical Abstract

Earth Planets and SpaceVol. 78(1)
University of Leeds (GB), Centre National d'Études Spatiales (FR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 80%
Geomagnetism and Paleomagnetism Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.