The Concept of Poetic Virility and Poetic Class in Classical Arabic Criticism: A Comparative Study of al-Asmaʿī, Ibn Sallām al-Jumaḥī, and Ibn al-Muʿtazz in the 2nd–3rd Centuries AH

This study analyzes the conceptual evolution of "Poetic Virility" (Fuḥūlat al-Shuʿarāʾ) and "Poetic Class" (Ṭabaqāt al-Shuʿarāʾ) within classical Arabic literary criticism during the 2nd–3rd centuries AH. Through a systematic textual-comparative methodology, it examines the critical works of al-Asmaʿī, Ibn Sallām al-Jumaḥī, and Ibn al-Muʿtazz to identify the evaluative criteria each scholar employed in classifying poets and to situate these criteria within their respective intellectual and historical contexts. Findings reveal a distinct developmental trajectory: al-Asmaʿī restrictively associated poetic virility with pre-Islamic poets based on quantitative output, qualitative excellence, and renown; Ibn Sallām expanded the framework to incorporate early Islamic poets, constructing a hierarchical class system rooted in artistic merit; and Ibn al-Muʿtazz shifted focus entirely to ʿAbbasid court poets, omitting the concept of virility while emphasizing panegyric and stylistic refinement. The study concludes that this progression reflects a broader transition from impressionistic, taste-based evaluation toward increasingly systematic and contextualized literary criticism in early Islamic intellectual history.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2025-12-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18017011
Primary Topic
Islamic Studies and History
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Concept of Poetic Virility and Poetic Class in Classical Arabic Criticism: A Comparative Study of al-Asmaʿī, Ibn Sallām al-Jumaḥī, and Ibn al-Muʿtazz in the 2nd–3rd Centuries AH

Bilal Al-Omar
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Islamic Studies and History
article

The Concept of Poetic Virility and Poetic Class in Classical Arabic Criticism: A Comparative Study of al-Asmaʿī, Ibn Sallām al-Jumaḥī, and Ibn al-Muʿtazz in the 2nd–3rd Centuries AH

Bilal Al-Omar
article en

Abstract

This study analyzes the conceptual evolution of "Poetic Virility" (Fuḥūlat al-Shuʿarāʾ) and "Poetic Class" (Ṭabaqāt al-Shuʿarāʾ) within classical Arabic literary criticism during the 2nd–3rd centuries AH. Through a systematic textual-comparative methodology, it examines the critical works of al-Asmaʿī, Ibn Sallām al-Jumaḥī, and Ibn al-Muʿtazz to identify the evaluative criteria each scholar employed in classifying poets and to situate these criteria within their respective intellectual and historical contexts. Findings reveal a distinct developmental trajectory: al-Asmaʿī restrictively associated poetic virility with pre-Islamic poets based on quantitative output, qualitative excellence, and renown; Ibn Sallām expanded the framework to incorporate early Islamic poets, constructing a hierarchical class system rooted in artistic merit; and Ibn al-Muʿtazz shifted focus entirely to ʿAbbasid court poets, omitting the concept of virility while emphasizing panegyric and stylistic refinement. The study concludes that this progression reflects a broader transition from impressionistic, taste-based evaluation toward increasingly systematic and contextualized literary criticism in early Islamic intellectual history.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
University of Sharjah (AE)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Islamic Studies and History
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.