Total Neoadjuvant Therapy Versus Conventional Chemoradiotherapy in Rectal Cancer: Impact on Tumor Regression Grade and the Predictive Value of CEA

<i>Background and Objectives</i>: The introduction of total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT) in the preoperative stage has been associated with improved oncological outcomes. However, TNT may lead to tissue fibrosis and be accompanied by increased difficulty during surgery. Additionally, predicting tumor response to neoadjuvant therapy is crucial for identifying patients who may achieve a complete pathological response (pCR) or qualify for organ-preserving strategies. The aim of this study is to evaluate the effect of TNT versus conventional chemoradiotherapy (CRT) on tumor regression grade (TRG) and the association between preoperative carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) levels and good tumor response. A secondary endpoint is to investigate the effect of TNT on surgical difficulty, using indirect indicators like the quality of total mesorectal excision (TME), circumferential resection margin (CRM), and achievement of R0 resection. <i>Materials and Methods</i>: This is a retrospective, single-center study including 93 patients with locally advanced rectal cancer who received either TNT (<i>n</i> = 43) or CRT (<i>n</i> = 50). <i>Results</i>: The TNT group, compared to the CRT group, demonstrated a significantly higher rate of pCR (TRG0) (37.2% vs. 18%, <i>p</i> = 0.038) and good tumor regression (TRG 0-1) (53.5% vs. 28%, <i>p</i> = 0.019). Furthermore, patients with CEA < 5 ng/mL showed significantly higher rates of good tumor response (TRG 0-1) compared to those with CEA ≥ 5 ng/mL (45.3% vs. 16.7%, <i>p</i> = 0.032). When further categorized by treatment type, CEA levels did not demonstrate statistically significant differences Lastly, increased surgical difficulty could not be established, as no significant differences were observed in terms of positive CRM rates, R0 resection, and TME quality between groups. <i>Conclusions</i>: TNT was associated with improved TRG scores compared to CRT without increasing surgical difficulty. Lower pre-treatment CEAs were linked to better tumor response, irrespective of the type of treatment. These findings support the oncological benefit of TNT and suggest that CEA may have some predictive value for treatment response.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Medicina
Published
2026-01-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina62010226
Primary Topic
Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Total Neoadjuvant Therapy Versus Conventional Chemoradiotherapy in Rectal Cancer: Impact on Tumor Regression Grade and the Predictive Value of CEA

Aikaterini Leventi, Konstantinos Stamou, Aikaterini Sarafi, Korkolis Dp et al.
Medicina
Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments
article

Total Neoadjuvant Therapy Versus Conventional Chemoradiotherapy in Rectal Cancer: Impact on Tumor Regression Grade and the Predictive Value of CEA

Aikaterini Leventi, Konstantinos Stamou, Aikaterini Sarafi, Korkolis Dp, Ioannis Papaconstantinou, Klaountia Athitaki
article en

Abstract

<i>Background and Objectives</i>: The introduction of total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT) in the preoperative stage has been associated with improved oncological outcomes. However, TNT may lead to tissue fibrosis and be accompanied by increased difficulty during surgery. Additionally, predicting tumor response to neoadjuvant therapy is crucial for identifying patients who may achieve a complete pathological response (pCR) or qualify for organ-preserving strategies. The aim of this study is to evaluate the effect of TNT versus conventional chemoradiotherapy (CRT) on tumor regression grade (TRG) and the association between preoperative carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) levels and good tumor response. A secondary endpoint is to investigate the effect of TNT on surgical difficulty, using indirect indicators like the quality of total mesorectal excision (TME), circumferential resection margin (CRM), and achievement of R0 resection. <i>Materials and Methods</i>: This is a retrospective, single-center study including 93 patients with locally advanced rectal cancer who received either TNT (<i>n</i> = 43) or CRT (<i>n</i> = 50). <i>Results</i>: The TNT group, compared to the CRT group, demonstrated a significantly higher rate of pCR (TRG0) (37.2% vs. 18%, <i>p</i> = 0.038) and good tumor regression (TRG 0-1) (53.5% vs. 28%, <i>p</i> = 0.019). Furthermore, patients with CEA < 5 ng/mL showed significantly higher rates of good tumor response (TRG 0-1) compared to those with CEA ≥ 5 ng/mL (45.3% vs. 16.7%, <i>p</i> = 0.032). When further categorized by treatment type, CEA levels did not demonstrate statistically significant differences Lastly, increased surgical difficulty could not be established, as no significant differences were observed in terms of positive CRM rates, R0 resection, and TME quality between groups. <i>Conclusions</i>: TNT was associated with improved TRG scores compared to CRT without increasing surgical difficulty. Lower pre-treatment CEAs were linked to better tumor response, irrespective of the type of treatment. These findings support the oncological benefit of TNT and suggest that CEA may have some predictive value for treatment response.

MedicinaVol. 62(1)
Aretaeio Hospital (GR), St Savas Hospital (GR), Chania General Hospital ”St. George” (GR), Mitera Hospital (GR)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 79%
Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.