The diagnostic and prognostic values of non-criteria antiphospholipid antibodies in obstetric antiphospholipid syndrome

Obstetric antiphospholipid syndrome (OAPS) is a subtype of antiphospholipid syndrome associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes. Non-criteria antiphospholipid antibodies (aPLs) were focused in recent years, but the diagnostic and prognostic values of them in OAPS were rarely explored. A single-center retrospective study enrolled 283 pregnant women with history of pregnancy loss at an university hospital in sourthwest China. All participants were tested for criteria and non-criteria aPLs, including anticardiolipin antibodies (aCL) IgA, anti-β2 glycoprotein I antibodies (aβ2GPI) IgA, anti-β2 glycoprotein I domain 1 (aβ2GPID1) IgG and anti-phosphatidylserine/ prothrombin (aPS/PT) IgG/IgM. The subsequent pregnancy outcomes were followed up. The prevalence of non-criteria aPLs were compared among patients who classified into OAPS, non-criteria OAPS (NOAPS) and control groups. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity and odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated to estimate diagnostic and prognostic values of these non-criteria aPLs for OAPS and NOAPS patients. The positive rate of aPS/PT IgM was higher in OAPS (44.4%) compared to NOAPS (18.1%) and controls (3.5%) (P < 0.001). aPS/PT IgM presented moderate diagnostic performance in OAPS (AUC = 0.72) but poor performance in NOAPS (AUC = 0.57). Parallel testing of lupus anticoagulant (LAC) and aPS/PT IgM enhanced sensitivity in diagnosing OAPS, and improved accuracy and sensitivity in diagnosing NOAPS. After adjustment, aPS/PT IgM remained a significant predictor of both overall adverse pregnancy outcomes (OR = 3.85, 95% CI: 1.10–13.40, P = 0.03) and early pregnancy loss before 10 weeks (OR = 4.87, 95% CI: 1.03–23.05, P = 0.04) in OAPS patients. However, due to the extremely low positive rates, we did not observe clinical significance of aCL IgA, aβ2GPI IgA, aß2GPID1 IgG and aPS/PT IgG. aPS/PT IgM exhibits diagnostic and prognostic value for OAPS patients. For NOAPS patients, parallel testing of aPS/PT IgM and LAC may improve diagnostic performance.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
Published
2026-01-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-026-08672-7
Primary Topic
Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The diagnostic and prognostic values of non-criteria antiphospholipid antibodies in obstetric antiphospholipid syndrome

Rujun Zeng, Jinbiao Han, Lang Qin, Qiqi Chen et al.
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Research
article

The diagnostic and prognostic values of non-criteria antiphospholipid antibodies in obstetric antiphospholipid syndrome

Rujun Zeng, Jinbiao Han, Lang Qin, Qiqi Chen, Rui Cai, Rui Gao, Wanrong Huang
article en

Abstract

Obstetric antiphospholipid syndrome (OAPS) is a subtype of antiphospholipid syndrome associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes. Non-criteria antiphospholipid antibodies (aPLs) were focused in recent years, but the diagnostic and prognostic values of them in OAPS were rarely explored. A single-center retrospective study enrolled 283 pregnant women with history of pregnancy loss at an university hospital in sourthwest China. All participants were tested for criteria and non-criteria aPLs, including anticardiolipin antibodies (aCL) IgA, anti-β2 glycoprotein I antibodies (aβ2GPI) IgA, anti-β2 glycoprotein I domain 1 (aβ2GPID1) IgG and anti-phosphatidylserine/ prothrombin (aPS/PT) IgG/IgM. The subsequent pregnancy outcomes were followed up. The prevalence of non-criteria aPLs were compared among patients who classified into OAPS, non-criteria OAPS (NOAPS) and control groups. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity and odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated to estimate diagnostic and prognostic values of these non-criteria aPLs for OAPS and NOAPS patients. The positive rate of aPS/PT IgM was higher in OAPS (44.4%) compared to NOAPS (18.1%) and controls (3.5%) (P < 0.001). aPS/PT IgM presented moderate diagnostic performance in OAPS (AUC = 0.72) but poor performance in NOAPS (AUC = 0.57). Parallel testing of lupus anticoagulant (LAC) and aPS/PT IgM enhanced sensitivity in diagnosing OAPS, and improved accuracy and sensitivity in diagnosing NOAPS. After adjustment, aPS/PT IgM remained a significant predictor of both overall adverse pregnancy outcomes (OR = 3.85, 95% CI: 1.10–13.40, P = 0.03) and early pregnancy loss before 10 weeks (OR = 4.87, 95% CI: 1.03–23.05, P = 0.04) in OAPS patients. However, due to the extremely low positive rates, we did not observe clinical significance of aCL IgA, aβ2GPI IgA, aß2GPID1 IgG and aPS/PT IgG. aPS/PT IgM exhibits diagnostic and prognostic value for OAPS patients. For NOAPS patients, parallel testing of aPS/PT IgM and LAC may improve diagnostic performance.

BMC Pregnancy and ChildbirthVol. 26(1)
Sichuan University (CN), West China Second University Hospital of Sichuan University (CN)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 80%
Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.