Decolonising inclusion: Reframing equity for non-academic women of colour in UK higher education

This article critically examines how non-academic women of colour experience inclusion within UK higher education institutions. Drawing on narrative and semi-structured interviews, it reveals that inclusion is often choreographed through surface-level gestures that legitimise universities without redistributing power. The analysis develops three conceptual tools – curated inclusion, institutional affective discipline and progression ambiguity – to theorise how diversity initiatives function as containment strategies rather than mechanisms for transformation. Informed by Black feminist, critical race and decolonial theories, the study exposes how emotional labour, strategic silences and conditional belonging operate as everyday technologies of racialised governance. By centring the voices of women in non-academic roles, the article extends existing debates on institutional whiteness and performative inclusion, arguing for a structural reimagining of equity work grounded in decolonial praxis and epistemic justice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Feminist Theory
Published
2026-01-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/14647001251393124
Primary Topic
Critical Race Theory in Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Decolonising inclusion: Reframing equity for non-academic women of colour in UK higher education

Abigal Muchecheti
Feminist Theory
Critical Race Theory in Education
article

Decolonising inclusion: Reframing equity for non-academic women of colour in UK higher education

Abigal Muchecheti
article en

Abstract

This article critically examines how non-academic women of colour experience inclusion within UK higher education institutions. Drawing on narrative and semi-structured interviews, it reveals that inclusion is often choreographed through surface-level gestures that legitimise universities without redistributing power. The analysis develops three conceptual tools – curated inclusion, institutional affective discipline and progression ambiguity – to theorise how diversity initiatives function as containment strategies rather than mechanisms for transformation. Informed by Black feminist, critical race and decolonial theories, the study exposes how emotional labour, strategic silences and conditional belonging operate as everyday technologies of racialised governance. By centring the voices of women in non-academic roles, the article extends existing debates on institutional whiteness and performative inclusion, arguing for a structural reimagining of equity work grounded in decolonial praxis and epistemic justice.

Feminist Theory
Oxford Brookes University (GB)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 83%
Critical Race Theory in Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.