Benefit and risk associated with interleukin-6 receptor inhibitor administration during severe COVID-19: a retrospective multicentric study

During severe and critical COVID-19, therapeutic options remain scarce. Among interventions, the use of interleukin-6 receptor inhibitor (IL-6Ri) is especially controversial due to persistent uncertainty about their efficacy and safety. To compare the occurrence of secondary infections, digestive and hematological complication function of the administration of IL-6Ri we conducted a multicentric retrospective French observational study. All severe or critical COVID-19 requiring hospital admission were included. Among 2587 patients requiring hospital admission, 1603 had a severe COVID-19 and 984 a critical one requiring ICU admission. 224 received at least one dose of tocilizumab or sarilumab. Incidence of secondary infection was 29.5% in the IL-6Ri group vs. 19.5% without IL-6Ri (p = 0.0004) in the whole population. This result remained consistent after adjustment, without multiple imputation (MI) and after MI (adjusted OR: 1.47 [1.25; 1.72]; p < 0.0001)). Incidence of hematological or digestive complication were similar between groups. Mortality of patients admitted in ward was higher in the IL-6Ri group (18.7% vs 10.5%, p = 0.0155). No difference in 28 days, ICU, hospital of 90 days mortality was noticed among ICU patients.Clinical trial registration: This study was registred on ClinicalTrial.gov: NCT05017441.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2026-01-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-36864-w
Primary Topic
COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Benefit and risk associated with interleukin-6 receptor inhibitor administration during severe COVID-19: a retrospective multicentric study

Audrey Fels, Nicolás Roche, J. Duranteau, Axel Philippe et al.
Scientific Reports
COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies
article

Benefit and risk associated with interleukin-6 receptor inhibitor administration during severe COVID-19: a retrospective multicentric study

Audrey Fels, Nicolás Roche, J. Duranteau, Axel Philippe, Theo Funk-Brentano, Flore Bintein, Olivier Voisin, Marine Cachanado, Alexia Plocque, Gilles Châtellier, F. Pène, S. Legriel, Noël Nicolas, David Montani, Laurent Savale, Charlène Lefèvre, Maëlle Youinou, Marc Tran, Pierre-Régis Burgel
article en

Abstract

During severe and critical COVID-19, therapeutic options remain scarce. Among interventions, the use of interleukin-6 receptor inhibitor (IL-6Ri) is especially controversial due to persistent uncertainty about their efficacy and safety. To compare the occurrence of secondary infections, digestive and hematological complication function of the administration of IL-6Ri we conducted a multicentric retrospective French observational study. All severe or critical COVID-19 requiring hospital admission were included. Among 2587 patients requiring hospital admission, 1603 had a severe COVID-19 and 984 a critical one requiring ICU admission. 224 received at least one dose of tocilizumab or sarilumab. Incidence of secondary infection was 29.5% in the IL-6Ri group vs. 19.5% without IL-6Ri (p = 0.0004) in the whole population. This result remained consistent after adjustment, without multiple imputation (MI) and after MI (adjusted OR: 1.47 [1.25; 1.72]; p < 0.0001)). Incidence of hematological or digestive complication were similar between groups. Mortality of patients admitted in ward was higher in the IL-6Ri group (18.7% vs 10.5%, p = 0.0155). No difference in 28 days, ICU, hospital of 90 days mortality was noticed among ICU patients.Clinical trial registration: This study was registred on ClinicalTrial.gov: NCT05017441.

Scientific ReportsVol. 16(1)
Délégation Paris 5 (FR), Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), Inserm (FR), Université de Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines (FR), Université Paris Cité (FR), Commissariat à l'Énergie Atomique et aux Énergies Alternatives (FR), Université Paris-Saclay (FR), Sorbonne Université (FR), Sorbonne Paris Cité (FR), Hôpital Cochin (FR), Assistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris (FR), Centre de recherche en Epidémiologie et Santé des Populations (FR), Institut de Biologie Intégrative de la Cellule (FR), Hôpital Marie Lannelongue (FR), CEA Paris-Saclay (FR), Hôpital Paris Saint-Joseph (FR), Institut Cochin (FR), Centre Hospitalier de Versailles (FR), Bicêtre Hospital (FR)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 77%
COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.