Factors Associated With Poor Outcome Among Guillain Barre Syndrome Patients Admitted in a Tertiary Hospital in the Philippines: A Retrospective Cohort Study

ABSTRACT Objectives Although a locally published paper clinically characterized Guillain Barre syndrome (GBS) patients admitted in one of the Philippines' largest hospitals, extensive identification of risk factors associated with poor outcomes has yet to be done. The main objective of this study is to determine the possible association between several outcome measures and GBS risk factors using different regression analytic methods of secondary data. Methods Data from 71 GBS patients from our previous study about possible determinants related to dysautonomia were analyzed. To determine the possible factors associated with binary outcomes like status on discharge, ambulation at 1 month, and presence or absence of pneumonia during admission, multiple logistic regression analysis was used while factors associated with continuous outcome like onset of motor recovery, multiple linear regression analysis was utilized. For failure outcomes with survival times, including days to dysautonomia or intubation, a cox proportional hazard model or its variants were utilized. Results Using dysautonomia as the main independent variable, and age and presence of pneumonia prior to GBS diagnosis as the possible confounders, no association between dysautonomia and different outcome parameters was noted whether unadjusted or adjusted odds ratio (OR) was used. Compared to other GBS variants, the odds of being bed or wheelchair bound on discharge was 10 times (95% CI: 1.7–57.7, p = 0.01) when a patient has the axonal variant of GBS. Moreover, the same cohort was 20 times (95% CI: 3.2–125.0, p < 0.01) more likely to be nonambulatory in 1 month when compared to other GBS variants. In terms of types of treatment, no association between the type of treatment and different outcome variables was noted whether uncontrolled or factors such as sex, days until admission, expanded disability status scale (EDSS) at admission, initial GBS‐DS, presence of pneumonia, proportion of patients with Brighton diagnostic level 1, and GBS type were controlled. Conclusion In the Philippines, the type of GBS is found to be associated with poor prognosis. Nevertheless, when possible confounders were controlled, the type of GBS, dysautonomia, and type of treatment were noted not to affect the outcomes. The insufficient power of the study may explain the negative results of the commonly associated factors of poor prognosis.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Clinical and Experimental Neuroimmunology
Published
2026-01-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/cen3.70047
Primary Topic
Peripheral Neuropathies and Disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Factors Associated With Poor Outcome Among Guillain Barre Syndrome Patients Admitted in a Tertiary Hospital in the Philippines: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Gerald T. Pagaling, Karen Joy Adiao, Mario B. Prado, Iris Ditan et al.
Clinical and Experimental Neuroimmunology
Peripheral Neuropathies and Disorders
article

Factors Associated With Poor Outcome Among Guillain Barre Syndrome Patients Admitted in a Tertiary Hospital in the Philippines: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Gerald T. Pagaling, Karen Joy Adiao, Mario B. Prado, Iris Ditan, Lowrence Precious Dichoso
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Objectives Although a locally published paper clinically characterized Guillain Barre syndrome (GBS) patients admitted in one of the Philippines' largest hospitals, extensive identification of risk factors associated with poor outcomes has yet to be done. The main objective of this study is to determine the possible association between several outcome measures and GBS risk factors using different regression analytic methods of secondary data. Methods Data from 71 GBS patients from our previous study about possible determinants related to dysautonomia were analyzed. To determine the possible factors associated with binary outcomes like status on discharge, ambulation at 1 month, and presence or absence of pneumonia during admission, multiple logistic regression analysis was used while factors associated with continuous outcome like onset of motor recovery, multiple linear regression analysis was utilized. For failure outcomes with survival times, including days to dysautonomia or intubation, a cox proportional hazard model or its variants were utilized. Results Using dysautonomia as the main independent variable, and age and presence of pneumonia prior to GBS diagnosis as the possible confounders, no association between dysautonomia and different outcome parameters was noted whether unadjusted or adjusted odds ratio (OR) was used. Compared to other GBS variants, the odds of being bed or wheelchair bound on discharge was 10 times (95% CI: 1.7–57.7, p = 0.01) when a patient has the axonal variant of GBS. Moreover, the same cohort was 20 times (95% CI: 3.2–125.0, p < 0.01) more likely to be nonambulatory in 1 month when compared to other GBS variants. In terms of types of treatment, no association between the type of treatment and different outcome variables was noted whether uncontrolled or factors such as sex, days until admission, expanded disability status scale (EDSS) at admission, initial GBS‐DS, presence of pneumonia, proportion of patients with Brighton diagnostic level 1, and GBS type were controlled. Conclusion In the Philippines, the type of GBS is found to be associated with poor prognosis. Nevertheless, when possible confounders were controlled, the type of GBS, dysautonomia, and type of treatment were noted not to affect the outcomes. The insufficient power of the study may explain the negative results of the commonly associated factors of poor prognosis.

Clinical and Experimental NeuroimmunologyVol. 17(1)
Philippine General Hospital (PH), University of Baguio (PH), University of the Philippines Manila (PH)
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 81%
Peripheral Neuropathies and Disorders
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.