How to simplify public scientific testimony? Response to Gelfert and Schneider
Abstract In their perceptive and constructive discussion of Scientific Testimony , Gelfert and Schneider articulate important challenges regarding simplification of public scientific testimony. In this response, I argue that while proper simplification is a hard task with many pitfalls, it is a task that may be guided by the science communication strategy— Justification Reporting —that I set forth in the book.
Authors
- Mikkel Gerken
Publication Details
- Journal
- Asian Journal of Philosophy
- Published
- 2026-01-21
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s44204-026-00374-3
- Primary Topic
- Misinformation and Its Impacts
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00