Intravenous fluid resuscitation: learning from a case study with complex presentation

Intravenous fluid resuscitation (IFR) is one of the most common interventions administered to patients with complex presentations of acute health deterioration. However, a growing body of evidence details variations in practice surrounding IFR due to differences in clinical guidelines, with the effectiveness of IFR reliant upon the selection of the appropriate rate, type and volume of fluid to be administered. According to governing bodies such as the Nursing and Midwifery Council, it is vital that both the prescriber and administrator of IFR have sound understanding of the physiological implications of the intervention and the evidence base for its efficacy. Critical reflection on nursing practice is fundamental in order to influence and improve future practice and patient outcomes. This article aims to extrapolate clinical learning from a case study from a physiological, evidence-based and role perspective on the administration of IFR.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
British Journal of Nursing
Published
2026-01-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.12968/bjon.2024.0449
Primary Topic
Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Intravenous fluid resuscitation: learning from a case study with complex presentation

Claire Perkins, Megan Henson
British Journal of Nursing
Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment
article

Intravenous fluid resuscitation: learning from a case study with complex presentation

Claire Perkins, Megan Henson
article en

Abstract

Intravenous fluid resuscitation (IFR) is one of the most common interventions administered to patients with complex presentations of acute health deterioration. However, a growing body of evidence details variations in practice surrounding IFR due to differences in clinical guidelines, with the effectiveness of IFR reliant upon the selection of the appropriate rate, type and volume of fluid to be administered. According to governing bodies such as the Nursing and Midwifery Council, it is vital that both the prescriber and administrator of IFR have sound understanding of the physiological implications of the intervention and the evidence base for its efficacy. Critical reflection on nursing practice is fundamental in order to influence and improve future practice and patient outcomes. This article aims to extrapolate clinical learning from a case study from a physiological, evidence-based and role perspective on the administration of IFR.

British Journal of NursingVol. 35(2)
Birmingham City University (GB), Royal Navy (GB)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 80%
Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.