Stability verification of frames with web tapered members and slender sections

Abstract This work presents a comprehensive parametric study using material and geometric non‐linear analyses that included the effect of imperfections (GMNIA) to determine the collapse loads of realistic frames with web tapered members and slender sections (Class 4). Various frame geometries and cross‐sectional shapes were considered totaling 22 different frames. A comparison between the results of the numerical simulations and those predicted by the General Method available in Clause 6.3.4 of Eurocode 3, shows that the method is too much on the safe side, since the estimated collapse loads are lower than those obtained using advanced calculation models (GMNIA). Finally, simple recommendations are proposed to enhance the efficiency of ultimate load estimation for frames using the General Method by adopting a less conservative buckling curve.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ce/papers
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/cepa.70137
Primary Topic
Structural Response to Dynamic Loads
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Stability verification of frames with web tapered members and slender sections

Carlos Couto, P. Vila Real, Raissa Trigo, Péter Márai
ce/papers
Structural Response to Dynamic Loads
article

Stability verification of frames with web tapered members and slender sections

Carlos Couto, P. Vila Real, Raissa Trigo, Péter Márai
article en

Abstract

Abstract This work presents a comprehensive parametric study using material and geometric non‐linear analyses that included the effect of imperfections (GMNIA) to determine the collapse loads of realistic frames with web tapered members and slender sections (Class 4). Various frame geometries and cross‐sectional shapes were considered totaling 22 different frames. A comparison between the results of the numerical simulations and those predicted by the General Method available in Clause 6.3.4 of Eurocode 3, shows that the method is too much on the safe side, since the estimated collapse loads are lower than those obtained using advanced calculation models (GMNIA). Finally, simple recommendations are proposed to enhance the efficiency of ultimate load estimation for frames using the General Method by adopting a less conservative buckling curve.

ce/papersVol. 8(6)
University of Luxembourg (LU), University of Aveiro (PT)
European Commission, Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia, Research Fund for Coal and Steel
Openalex Percentile: Top 33%
Structural Response to Dynamic Loads
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.