Police staffing shortages, public awareness, and policy preferences

Since the summer of 2020, police agencies across the United States have continued to experience police staffing shortages. The consequences of understaffed police agencies are well studied, but little is known about whether the public is aware of the staffing problem and its consequences for public safety and police behavior. This study presents a pre-registered factorial survey experiment to 3105 US adults, varying the information respondents see on the consequences of staffing shortages (e.g., public safety, police behavior) and the messenger of this information (e.g., police chief, mayor). Respondents are then asked about their levels of concern about police staffing, the downstream consequences of staffing shortages on crime and public safety, and their willingness to pay more taxes to resolve the issue. We find a strong effect of the informational treatments on the public's concern about understaffed police departments and their willingness to pay more taxes, with surprisingly little effect heterogeneity by respondent race and partisanship. Despite well-documented polarized views toward contemporary policing among Americans, we find strong support across partisan and racial dimensions for resolving police staffing shortages. Our findings suggest that voters understand the link between short-staffed police departments and the consequences for public safety, and are even willing to pay more taxes in response. As public opinion is the primary heuristic elected policymakers rely on for forming policy agendas, these results indicate a real opportunity for policy action and proposals. Relevant stakeholders are likely to benefit from being clear about the consequences of understaffing on public safety. • Information about the consequences of police staffing shortages increased public concern about understaffed police agencies. • Information about the consequences of police staffing increased willingness to pay more taxes to address staffing shortages. • The messenger of the information had little impact on perceptions of police staffing shortages. • There was little evidence of heterogeneity across political and racial subgroups. • Police agencies and policymakers should be transparent about staffing shortages when shaping policy agendas.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Criminal Justice
Published
2026-01-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2026.102599
Primary Topic
Policing Practices and Perceptions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Police staffing shortages, public awareness, and policy preferences

Scott M. Mourtgos, Brandon Tregle, Hunter M. Boehme, Joshua McCrain
Journal of Criminal Justice
Policing Practices and Perceptions
article

Police staffing shortages, public awareness, and policy preferences

Scott M. Mourtgos, Brandon Tregle, Hunter M. Boehme, Joshua McCrain
article en

Abstract

Since the summer of 2020, police agencies across the United States have continued to experience police staffing shortages. The consequences of understaffed police agencies are well studied, but little is known about whether the public is aware of the staffing problem and its consequences for public safety and police behavior. This study presents a pre-registered factorial survey experiment to 3105 US adults, varying the information respondents see on the consequences of staffing shortages (e.g., public safety, police behavior) and the messenger of this information (e.g., police chief, mayor). Respondents are then asked about their levels of concern about police staffing, the downstream consequences of staffing shortages on crime and public safety, and their willingness to pay more taxes to resolve the issue. We find a strong effect of the informational treatments on the public's concern about understaffed police departments and their willingness to pay more taxes, with surprisingly little effect heterogeneity by respondent race and partisanship. Despite well-documented polarized views toward contemporary policing among Americans, we find strong support across partisan and racial dimensions for resolving police staffing shortages. Our findings suggest that voters understand the link between short-staffed police departments and the consequences for public safety, and are even willing to pay more taxes in response. As public opinion is the primary heuristic elected policymakers rely on for forming policy agendas, these results indicate a real opportunity for policy action and proposals. Relevant stakeholders are likely to benefit from being clear about the consequences of understaffing on public safety. • Information about the consequences of police staffing shortages increased public concern about understaffed police agencies. • Information about the consequences of police staffing increased willingness to pay more taxes to address staffing shortages. • The messenger of the information had little impact on perceptions of police staffing shortages. • There was little evidence of heterogeneity across political and racial subgroups. • Police agencies and policymakers should be transparent about staffing shortages when shaping policy agendas.

Journal of Criminal JusticeVol. 103
University of South Carolina (US), University of Utah (US)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 82%
Policing Practices and Perceptions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.