Bridging the Implementation Gap: Refugee Governance and Institutional Coordination in Uganda’s Borderlands

Executive summary This article analyzes how Uganda’s progressive refugee governance model encounters structural implementation barriers in the West Nile borderlands, where institutional pluralism, spatial marginality, and porous borders reshape the delivery of protection and integration. Drawing on ethnographic fieldwork and stakeholder interviews in Nebbi and Yumbe districts, the study examines how national frameworks are reinterpreted through local governance arrangements marked by overlapping authorities, contested land tenure, and uneven resource distribution. The analysis shows that implementation challenges are not solely technical or financial but are rooted in deeper tensions between statutory and customary systems of authority, as well as the enduring influence of colonial legacies and kinship networks. These factors combine to fragment service delivery, constrain institutional coordination, and shape the lived experience of both refugees and hosts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal on Migration and Human Security
Published
2026-01-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/23315024251409778
Primary Topic
Migration, Refugees, and Integration
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Bridging the Implementation Gap: Refugee Governance and Institutional Coordination in Uganda’s Borderlands

Jussi P. Laine
Journal on Migration and Human Security
Migration, Refugees, and Integration
article

Bridging the Implementation Gap: Refugee Governance and Institutional Coordination in Uganda’s Borderlands

Jussi P. Laine
article en

Abstract

Executive summary This article analyzes how Uganda’s progressive refugee governance model encounters structural implementation barriers in the West Nile borderlands, where institutional pluralism, spatial marginality, and porous borders reshape the delivery of protection and integration. Drawing on ethnographic fieldwork and stakeholder interviews in Nebbi and Yumbe districts, the study examines how national frameworks are reinterpreted through local governance arrangements marked by overlapping authorities, contested land tenure, and uneven resource distribution. The analysis shows that implementation challenges are not solely technical or financial but are rooted in deeper tensions between statutory and customary systems of authority, as well as the enduring influence of colonial legacies and kinship networks. These factors combine to fragment service delivery, constrain institutional coordination, and shape the lived experience of both refugees and hosts.

Journal on Migration and Human SecurityVol. 14(1)
University of Eastern Finland (FI), Karelia University of Applied Sciences (FI)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 83%
Migration, Refugees, and Integration
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.