Seismic Behavior of Multi‐Storey Volumetric Modular Buildings: Comparing Concentrically Braced Frames and Reinforced Concrete Shear Walls

Abstract Multi‐storey modular buildings, constructed from prefabricated steel modules, are gaining popularity due to their efficiency, cost‐effectiveness, and reduced construction time. However, their seismic performance and stability remain key areas of research. While reinforced concrete shear walls are commonly used as seismic force‐resisting systems (SFRS), this study investigates the feasibility of using concentrically braced frames (CBF) as an alternative. Although CBF effectively resists lateral loads, they are susceptible to soft‐storey collapse under seismic excitation. This paper examines the lateral behaviour of two 12‐storey modular buildings, where steel modules serve as the gravity force‐resisting system (GFRS), and either CBF or reinforced concrete shear wall acts as the SFRS. Nonlinear finite element pushover analyses are conducted using OpenSees to evaluate key performance metrics, including global behaviour, inter‐storey drift, and shear distribution between the GFRS and SFRS. The findings highlight the potential for efficiently using CBF in multi‐storey modular steel structures while providing deeper insights into the seismic force distribution between the GFRS and SFRS. Notably, results indicate that the GFRS can carry a significant portion of seismic forces, particularly in the upper stories.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ce/papers
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/cepa.70205
Primary Topic
Structural Analysis and Optimization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Seismic Behavior of Multi‐Storey Volumetric Modular Buildings: Comparing Concentrically Braced Frames and Reinforced Concrete Shear Walls

Ali Rafiee, Ehsan Bazarchi, A. Davaran, C.P. Lamarche
ce/papers
Structural Analysis and Optimization
article

Seismic Behavior of Multi‐Storey Volumetric Modular Buildings: Comparing Concentrically Braced Frames and Reinforced Concrete Shear Walls

Ali Rafiee, Ehsan Bazarchi, A. Davaran, C.P. Lamarche
article en

Abstract

Abstract Multi‐storey modular buildings, constructed from prefabricated steel modules, are gaining popularity due to their efficiency, cost‐effectiveness, and reduced construction time. However, their seismic performance and stability remain key areas of research. While reinforced concrete shear walls are commonly used as seismic force‐resisting systems (SFRS), this study investigates the feasibility of using concentrically braced frames (CBF) as an alternative. Although CBF effectively resists lateral loads, they are susceptible to soft‐storey collapse under seismic excitation. This paper examines the lateral behaviour of two 12‐storey modular buildings, where steel modules serve as the gravity force‐resisting system (GFRS), and either CBF or reinforced concrete shear wall acts as the SFRS. Nonlinear finite element pushover analyses are conducted using OpenSees to evaluate key performance metrics, including global behaviour, inter‐storey drift, and shear distribution between the GFRS and SFRS. The findings highlight the potential for efficiently using CBF in multi‐storey modular steel structures while providing deeper insights into the seismic force distribution between the GFRS and SFRS. Notably, results indicate that the GFRS can carry a significant portion of seismic forces, particularly in the upper stories.

ce/papersVol. 8(6)
Université de Sherbrooke (CA)
Université de Sherbrooke, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada, Fonds de recherche du Québec – Nature et technologies
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 33%
Structural Analysis and Optimization
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.