Quantifying Steel Deck Imperfections Using Lidar and Photogrammetry

Abstract Geometric imperfections affect the buckling capacity of thin‐walled structural steel members. Conventional methods to measure geometric imperfections include using hand tools and laser scanning at specific locations around the cross‐section. This paper presents a study to quantify geometric imperfections of three different profiled steel decks using a handheld LiDAR scanner and photogrammetry. Four measurement methods were assessed: (1) traditional hand measurements, (2) highdensity point cloud scanning (using the Artec Leo, up to 0.1 mm precision), (3) lowdensity point cloud data (up to 1 cm precision), and (4) photogrammetry using an Apple iPad Pro with the Scaniverse app. The three decks included a 9/16‐inch (1.4 cm) floor form deck, a 1.5‐inch‐(3.8 cm) wide rib roof deck, and a 3‐inch (7.6 cm) composite floor deck. Key parameters included top and bottom flange widths, the angle and radius between flanges, and thickness. Geometric imperfections were quantified using high‐density point cloud scans in Artec Studio software, which were accurate but required significant post‐processing and could not capture thickness. The Scaniverse app produced detailed deck visualizations through photogrammetry and matched manual measurements; however, its low‐density point cloud lacked sufficient detail to measure key geometric characteristics. The comparison of results aims to improve imperfection scanning and analysis.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ce/papers
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/cepa.70118
Primary Topic
3D Surveying and Cultural Heritage
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Quantifying Steel Deck Imperfections Using Lidar and Photogrammetry

Richa Dutta Rakhee, Hannah B. Blum, Jacknetson Naw
ce/papers
3D Surveying and Cultural Heritage
article

Quantifying Steel Deck Imperfections Using Lidar and Photogrammetry

Richa Dutta Rakhee, Hannah B. Blum, Jacknetson Naw
article en

Abstract

Abstract Geometric imperfections affect the buckling capacity of thin‐walled structural steel members. Conventional methods to measure geometric imperfections include using hand tools and laser scanning at specific locations around the cross‐section. This paper presents a study to quantify geometric imperfections of three different profiled steel decks using a handheld LiDAR scanner and photogrammetry. Four measurement methods were assessed: (1) traditional hand measurements, (2) highdensity point cloud scanning (using the Artec Leo, up to 0.1 mm precision), (3) lowdensity point cloud data (up to 1 cm precision), and (4) photogrammetry using an Apple iPad Pro with the Scaniverse app. The three decks included a 9/16‐inch (1.4 cm) floor form deck, a 1.5‐inch‐(3.8 cm) wide rib roof deck, and a 3‐inch (7.6 cm) composite floor deck. Key parameters included top and bottom flange widths, the angle and radius between flanges, and thickness. Geometric imperfections were quantified using high‐density point cloud scans in Artec Studio software, which were accurate but required significant post‐processing and could not capture thickness. The Scaniverse app produced detailed deck visualizations through photogrammetry and matched manual measurements; however, its low‐density point cloud lacked sufficient detail to measure key geometric characteristics. The comparison of results aims to improve imperfection scanning and analysis.

ce/papersVol. 8(6)
University of Wisconsin System (US), University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 21%
3D Surveying and Cultural Heritage
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.