Crowdsourcing as a methodology for global movements: building counter-hegemonic knowledge of de-privatisation

The repertoire of contemporary social movements increasingly includes utilising data in strategic pursuit of their goals. In this paper, we explore the potential for co-produced crowdsourced data in the context of a global, networked movement advocating for the de-privatisation of public services. We argue that crowdsourcing can produce data to inform and strengthen alternative progressive narratives to counteract dominant elite discourses still wedded to increasingly contradictory global neoliberal political and economic governance rhetorics. The building of counter-hegemonic knowledge is particularly critical in the current moment where elite and dominant narratives are being called into question. The paper also contributes to social movement studies by developing the theoretical and conceptual framework of crowdsourcing, to improve its ‘fit’ for co-produced social science. In this way, the paper contributes to social movement scholarship on the role of data; the conceptual development of the methodology itself; and ongoing debates around social movements as knowledge producers.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Social movement studies
Published
2026-01-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/14742837.2026.2616459
Primary Topic
Open Source Software Innovations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Crowdsourcing as a methodology for global movements: building counter-hegemonic knowledge of de-privatisation

Franziska Christina Paul, Bethia Pearson, Andrew Cumbers
Social movement studies
Open Source Software Innovations
article

Crowdsourcing as a methodology for global movements: building counter-hegemonic knowledge of de-privatisation

Franziska Christina Paul, Bethia Pearson, Andrew Cumbers
article en

Abstract

The repertoire of contemporary social movements increasingly includes utilising data in strategic pursuit of their goals. In this paper, we explore the potential for co-produced crowdsourced data in the context of a global, networked movement advocating for the de-privatisation of public services. We argue that crowdsourcing can produce data to inform and strengthen alternative progressive narratives to counteract dominant elite discourses still wedded to increasingly contradictory global neoliberal political and economic governance rhetorics. The building of counter-hegemonic knowledge is particularly critical in the current moment where elite and dominant narratives are being called into question. The paper also contributes to social movement studies by developing the theoretical and conceptual framework of crowdsourcing, to improve its ‘fit’ for co-produced social science. In this way, the paper contributes to social movement scholarship on the role of data; the conceptual development of the methodology itself; and ongoing debates around social movements as knowledge producers.

Social movement studies
University of Glasgow (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 85%
Open Source Software Innovations
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.