How social science academics use AI – Activities and tools

This study examines generative AI integration in Lithuania’s social sciences research and education following ChatGPT’s 2022 release, exploring usage patterns and challenges faced by researchers. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 13 Vilnius University social sciences faculty members, selected for diverse AI-related expertise. Content analysis examined perceptions, roles and ethical considerations of AI use in academic activities. AI was perceived as valuable for information-seeking and research productivity, but tensions exist between adoption benefits and challenges related to academic integrity, methodological standards and variable output quality. Participants emphasised the need for clearer AI usage norms. Generative AI integration in social science research at Vilnius University presents significant opportunities and challenges. Addressing tensions between effort-saving and competence acquisition, unclear guidelines and AI output reliability is crucial for positive academic AI utilisation. The research highlights the importance of comprehensive guidelines and enhanced digital literacy to take advantage of AI benefits while maintaining academic integrity.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Information Science
Published
2026-01-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/01655515251396892
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

How social science academics use AI – Activities and tools

Elena Macevičiūtė, Erika Janiūnienė, Fausta Kepalienė, T. D. Wilson
Journal of Information Science
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
article

How social science academics use AI – Activities and tools

Elena Macevičiūtė, Erika Janiūnienė, Fausta Kepalienė, T. D. Wilson
article en

Abstract

This study examines generative AI integration in Lithuania’s social sciences research and education following ChatGPT’s 2022 release, exploring usage patterns and challenges faced by researchers. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 13 Vilnius University social sciences faculty members, selected for diverse AI-related expertise. Content analysis examined perceptions, roles and ethical considerations of AI use in academic activities. AI was perceived as valuable for information-seeking and research productivity, but tensions exist between adoption benefits and challenges related to academic integrity, methodological standards and variable output quality. Participants emphasised the need for clearer AI usage norms. Generative AI integration in social science research at Vilnius University presents significant opportunities and challenges. Addressing tensions between effort-saving and competence acquisition, unclear guidelines and AI output reliability is crucial for positive academic AI utilisation. The research highlights the importance of comprehensive guidelines and enhanced digital literacy to take advantage of AI benefits while maintaining academic integrity.

Journal of Information Science
Vilnius University (LT), Vilnius University of Applied Sciences (LT), University of Borås (SE)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 81%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

How social science academics use AI – Activities and tools — Elena Macevičiūtė, Erika Janiūnienė, et al. · Journal of Information Science (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS