Static Tests on Imperfect Butt‐Welded Connections ‐ Effects of Porosity, Undercut, and Lack of Penetration

Abstract The design of steel structures within Europe is conducted according to Eurocode 3 specifications. The fabrication and construction of these are subject to quality, execution, and control requirements as outlined in EN 1090‐2. For welded connections under static loading, Eurocode 3 refers to the quality level C set out in ISO 5817. However, this specification is not explicitly stated in the background document of Eurocode 3. To address this gap, an experimental investigation has been performed on 17 specimens exhibiting different weld imperfections with the objective of evaluating the impact of the weld quality levels defined in ISO 5817 on the load‐bearing capacity. The tested specimens are butt‐welded connections welded from one side with imperfections such as porosity, lack of penetration, and undercut. Non‐destructive tests, including visual testing, 3D scanning, and radiographic testing were employed to identify the location and dimensions of imperfections. Next, static tests showed that imperfections such as lack of penetration and porosity of quality level D or lower reduced the load‐bearing capacity. In contrast, undercut at quality level D did not have an impact on the static resistance. Furthermore, combinations of several imperfections had a significant impact on the load‐bearing capacity. These findings provide valuable insights that may be used to reassess the necessity of quality level C required in EN 1993‐1‐8 for the static resistance.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ce/papers
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/cepa.70177
Primary Topic
Structural Load-Bearing Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Static Tests on Imperfect Butt‐Welded Connections ‐ Effects of Porosity, Undercut, and Lack of Penetration

André Beyer, Maël Couchaux, Kevin Mouradian
ce/papers
Structural Load-Bearing Analysis
article

Static Tests on Imperfect Butt‐Welded Connections ‐ Effects of Porosity, Undercut, and Lack of Penetration

André Beyer, Maël Couchaux, Kevin Mouradian
article en

Abstract

Abstract The design of steel structures within Europe is conducted according to Eurocode 3 specifications. The fabrication and construction of these are subject to quality, execution, and control requirements as outlined in EN 1090‐2. For welded connections under static loading, Eurocode 3 refers to the quality level C set out in ISO 5817. However, this specification is not explicitly stated in the background document of Eurocode 3. To address this gap, an experimental investigation has been performed on 17 specimens exhibiting different weld imperfections with the objective of evaluating the impact of the weld quality levels defined in ISO 5817 on the load‐bearing capacity. The tested specimens are butt‐welded connections welded from one side with imperfections such as porosity, lack of penetration, and undercut. Non‐destructive tests, including visual testing, 3D scanning, and radiographic testing were employed to identify the location and dimensions of imperfections. Next, static tests showed that imperfections such as lack of penetration and porosity of quality level D or lower reduced the load‐bearing capacity. In contrast, undercut at quality level D did not have an impact on the static resistance. Furthermore, combinations of several imperfections had a significant impact on the load‐bearing capacity. These findings provide valuable insights that may be used to reassess the necessity of quality level C required in EN 1993‐1‐8 for the static resistance.

ce/papersVol. 8(6)
Institut National des Sciences Appliquées de Rennes (FR), Centre Technique Industriel De La Construction Metallique (FR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 33%
Structural Load-Bearing Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.