Costs and cost-effectiveness of community health worker programs on reproductive, maternal, newborn and child health in low- and middle-income countries (2015–2024): A scoping review

Community Health Workers (CHWs) are vital in delivering primary health care in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). To inform their broader rollout, this study updates a 2015 review, critically examining the costs, cost-effectiveness and affordability of reproductive, maternal, newborn and child health (RMNCH) CHW programs in LMICs. A scoping review was conducted using ten databases and grey literature, covering studies published between August 2015 and July 2024. Search terms related to "Community Health Workers" and "Economic Evaluations" were used. Studies were screened via Covidence software based on inclusion and exclusion criteria. Data on study methodology, costs, and outcomes were extracted, tabulated in Microsoft Excel, and analysed. Across 53 studies (21 about reproductive health, maternal and newborn care and 32 child health focused), covering 161 scenarios, the most common cost metrics for CHW-led interventions were cost per beneficiary (ranging from $0.02 to $1,547), cost per capita (ranging from $0.09 to $20.25), and cost per consultation (ranging from $0.26 to $52.91). Of 100 scenarios that assessed cost-effectiveness, the majority concluded CHWs were cost-effective, most frequently when compared against an alternative service or delivery modality, such as facility-based care, or the no-longer widely accepted threshold of a country's gross domestic product per capita. Few studies assessed the affordability of CHW programs for government and/or partners. Evidence suggests that CHWs are often more cost-effective than alternative service or delivery modalities, particularly for child health. The evidence is however constrained by the heterogeneity of methods and reporting standards. To best guide future implementation of CHW programs, future research should focus on whether these interventions are affordable to governments and/or partners.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PLOS Global Public Health
Published
2026-01-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgph.0004893
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Global Maternal and Child Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
41.22
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Costs and cost-effectiveness of community health worker programs on reproductive, maternal, newborn and child health in low- and middle-income countries (2015–2024): A scoping review

Sandra Mudhune, Molly Mantus, Angele Bienvenue Ishimwe, Mardieh Dennis et al.
1 citations
PLOS Global Public Health
Global Maternal and Child Health
41.22
article

Costs and cost-effectiveness of community health worker programs on reproductive, maternal, newborn and child health in low- and middle-income countries (2015–2024): A scoping review

Sandra Mudhune, Molly Mantus, Angele Bienvenue Ishimwe, Mardieh Dennis, Maryse Kok, Dickson Mbewe, Meghan Bruce Kumar, Ariwame Jiménez, Jessica Cook, Daniel Palazuelos, Kelsey Vaughan, Patrick Kawooya, Michee Nshimayesu, Shobhana Nagraj, Zeus Aranda, Linnea Stansert Katzen, James O’Donovan, Karen E. Finnegan, Madeleine Ballard, Rachel Vreeman, M. Matias Iberico, Cleo Baskin, Josef Ernst
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Community Health Workers (CHWs) are vital in delivering primary health care in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). To inform their broader rollout, this study updates a 2015 review, critically examining the costs, cost-effectiveness and affordability of reproductive, maternal, newborn and child health (RMNCH) CHW programs in LMICs. A scoping review was conducted using ten databases and grey literature, covering studies published between August 2015 and July 2024. Search terms related to "Community Health Workers" and "Economic Evaluations" were used. Studies were screened via Covidence software based on inclusion and exclusion criteria. Data on study methodology, costs, and outcomes were extracted, tabulated in Microsoft Excel, and analysed. Across 53 studies (21 about reproductive health, maternal and newborn care and 32 child health focused), covering 161 scenarios, the most common cost metrics for CHW-led interventions were cost per beneficiary (ranging from $0.02 to $1,547), cost per capita (ranging from $0.09 to $20.25), and cost per consultation (ranging from $0.26 to $52.91). Of 100 scenarios that assessed cost-effectiveness, the majority concluded CHWs were cost-effective, most frequently when compared against an alternative service or delivery modality, such as facility-based care, or the no-longer widely accepted threshold of a country's gross domestic product per capita. Few studies assessed the affordability of CHW programs for government and/or partners. Evidence suggests that CHWs are often more cost-effective than alternative service or delivery modalities, particularly for child health. The evidence is however constrained by the heterogeneity of methods and reporting standards. To best guide future implementation of CHW programs, future research should focus on whether these interventions are affordable to governments and/or partners.

PLOS Global Public HealthVol. 6(1)
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US), Tulane University (US), Uppsala University (SE), Brigham and Women's Hospital (US), Partners In Health (US), Harvard University (US), University of Liverpool (GB), Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine (GB), University of Cambridge (GB), Stellenbosch University (ZA), Malawi-Liverpool-Wellcome Trust Clinical Research Programme (MW), East London NHS Foundation Trust (GB), Northumbria University (GB), NYU Langone Health (US), Impact Solutions (United Kingdom) (GB), University of Global Health Equity (RW), Men's Health Boston (US), Harvard Global Health Institute (US), Community Partners (US), Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (BR), Uganda Christian University (UG), Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (US)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Global Maternal and Child Health
41.22
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.