University Students' Writing Feedback Literacy in the <scp>AI</scp> Era: The Interplay of Generative <scp>AI</scp> Acceptance, Writing Anxiety and Writing Self‐Efficacy in Chinese <scp>EMI</scp> Educational Contexts

ABSTRACT As artificial intelligence (AI) tools reshape second language (L2) writing, how technological and psychological factors jointly shape English‐medium instruction (EMI) students' writing feedback literacy remains underexplored. Using an online questionnaire with 500 Chinese EMI university students, this study employed structural equation modelling (SEM) to examine how generative AI acceptance, writing anxiety and writing self‐efficacy shape students' writing feedback literacy. The results showed that (1) generative AI acceptance positively and significantly predicts students' writing feedback literacy and writing self‐efficacy, and negatively predicts writing anxiety; (2) writing self‐efficacy positively mediated the relationship between generative AI acceptance and writing feedback literacy, while writing anxiety mediated the relationship by reducing negative emotions; and (3) generative AI acceptance improves writing feedback literacy by raising students' self‐efficacy and lowering their writing anxiety. This study broadens understanding of writing feedback literacy in the AI era by clarifying the psychological mechanism linking generative AI acceptance to writing feedback literacy in EMI writing, and offers pedagogical implications for integrating AI‐based support to improve EMI students' emotions and feedback engagement.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Education
Published
2026-01-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.70478
Citations
1
Primary Topic
EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
72.27
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

University Students' Writing Feedback Literacy in the AI Era: The Interplay of Generative AI Acceptance, Writing Anxiety and Writing Self‐Efficacy in Chinese EMI Educational Contexts

Chao Zhou, Ying Wang
1 citations
European Journal of Education
EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
72.27
article

University Students' Writing Feedback Literacy in the AI Era: The Interplay of Generative AI Acceptance, Writing Anxiety and Writing Self‐Efficacy in Chinese EMI Educational Contexts

Chao Zhou, Ying Wang
article en
1 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT As artificial intelligence (AI) tools reshape second language (L2) writing, how technological and psychological factors jointly shape English‐medium instruction (EMI) students' writing feedback literacy remains underexplored. Using an online questionnaire with 500 Chinese EMI university students, this study employed structural equation modelling (SEM) to examine how generative AI acceptance, writing anxiety and writing self‐efficacy shape students' writing feedback literacy. The results showed that (1) generative AI acceptance positively and significantly predicts students' writing feedback literacy and writing self‐efficacy, and negatively predicts writing anxiety; (2) writing self‐efficacy positively mediated the relationship between generative AI acceptance and writing feedback literacy, while writing anxiety mediated the relationship by reducing negative emotions; and (3) generative AI acceptance improves writing feedback literacy by raising students' self‐efficacy and lowering their writing anxiety. This study broadens understanding of writing feedback literacy in the AI era by clarifying the psychological mechanism linking generative AI acceptance to writing feedback literacy in EMI writing, and offers pedagogical implications for integrating AI‐based support to improve EMI students' emotions and feedback engagement.

European Journal of EducationVol. 61(1)
North China University of Water Resources and Electric Power (CN), Macao Polytechnic University (MO)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
72.27
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.