Policy Brief: Ensuring the Resolution of Political Conflict between Political Factions in Sudan

This policy brief provides a comprehensive framework for improving international engagement with Sudan, focusing on key strategies to address the current political challenges. The analysis highlights the complexities arising from Sudan’s political alliances, particularly the role of the Tagadom coalition and the Democratic Bloc (DB), and how these dynamics impact the broader political landscape. The brief underscores the limitations of relying solely on the Tagadom coalition, which, despite its neutrality, has not fully represented the diverse interests of the Sudanese populace. The shifting support of the DB towards the Sudanese Armed Forces (SAF) further complicates the political process, introducing additional layers of division and conflict. The international community’s current approach, which emphasizes a ceasefire, has inadvertently reinforced existing divisions. To achieve a sustainable transition, this brief advocates for a more balanced approach that includes power-sharing arrangements and trust-building measures. Recommendations include expanding engagement beyond the Tagadom coalition, promoting equitable power-sharing, and facilitating dialogue among all relevant parties.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2024-12-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18353892
Primary Topic
Global Peace and Security Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Policy Brief: Ensuring the Resolution of Political Conflict between Political Factions in Sudan

Khattab Hamad, Mohammed Galal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Global Peace and Security Dynamics
article

Policy Brief: Ensuring the Resolution of Political Conflict between Political Factions in Sudan

Khattab Hamad, Mohammed Galal
article en

Abstract

This policy brief provides a comprehensive framework for improving international engagement with Sudan, focusing on key strategies to address the current political challenges. The analysis highlights the complexities arising from Sudan’s political alliances, particularly the role of the Tagadom coalition and the Democratic Bloc (DB), and how these dynamics impact the broader political landscape. The brief underscores the limitations of relying solely on the Tagadom coalition, which, despite its neutrality, has not fully represented the diverse interests of the Sudanese populace. The shifting support of the DB towards the Sudanese Armed Forces (SAF) further complicates the political process, introducing additional layers of division and conflict. The international community’s current approach, which emphasizes a ceasefire, has inadvertently reinforced existing divisions. To achieve a sustainable transition, this brief advocates for a more balanced approach that includes power-sharing arrangements and trust-building measures. Recommendations include expanding engagement beyond the Tagadom coalition, promoting equitable power-sharing, and facilitating dialogue among all relevant parties.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
African Leadership Institute (ZA)
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Global Peace and Security Dynamics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Policy Brief: Ensuring the Resolution of Political Conflict between Political Factions in Sudan — Khattab Hamad, Mohammed Galal · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS