Closed Form Prediction of the Deformation Capacity of Bolted T‐Stubs

Abstract The component method currently codified in Eurocode 3 Part 1‐8, enables the simplified analytical modelling of the joint behaviour by decomposing connections into basic components. However, this method shows limitations in accurately predicting the actual collapse mechanisms and the deformation capacity. Within this framework, this study addresses these limitations by focusing on the T‐stub component, proposing a unified and simplified methodology to evaluate its ultimate resistance and deformation capacity. Building upon recent advancements, a refined classification of failure modes is adopted, introducing a novel intermediate failure mechanism (MEC‐1.2) and incorporating a more accurate estimation of the contact force location. Closed‐form expressions for strength and ductility are derived for each failure mode, drawing from and extending existing models. These formulations are validated through an extensive parametric analysis involving 146 T‐stub configurations. Results demonstrate satisfactory agreement, with average predictive errors within 10% and Coefficients of Variation below 0.15. This work contributes with a practical and reliable tool to the evaluation of the T‐stub performance and lays the foundation for future developments toward joint modelling with the component method.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ce/papers
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/cepa.70183
Primary Topic
Structural Load-Bearing Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Closed Form Prediction of the Deformation Capacity of Bolted T‐Stubs

Massimo Latour, Antonella Bianca Francavilla, Arnaud Neutelers, Gianvittorio Rizzano
ce/papers
Structural Load-Bearing Analysis
article

Closed Form Prediction of the Deformation Capacity of Bolted T‐Stubs

Massimo Latour, Antonella Bianca Francavilla, Arnaud Neutelers, Gianvittorio Rizzano
article en

Abstract

Abstract The component method currently codified in Eurocode 3 Part 1‐8, enables the simplified analytical modelling of the joint behaviour by decomposing connections into basic components. However, this method shows limitations in accurately predicting the actual collapse mechanisms and the deformation capacity. Within this framework, this study addresses these limitations by focusing on the T‐stub component, proposing a unified and simplified methodology to evaluate its ultimate resistance and deformation capacity. Building upon recent advancements, a refined classification of failure modes is adopted, introducing a novel intermediate failure mechanism (MEC‐1.2) and incorporating a more accurate estimation of the contact force location. Closed‐form expressions for strength and ductility are derived for each failure mode, drawing from and extending existing models. These formulations are validated through an extensive parametric analysis involving 146 T‐stub configurations. Results demonstrate satisfactory agreement, with average predictive errors within 10% and Coefficients of Variation below 0.15. This work contributes with a practical and reliable tool to the evaluation of the T‐stub performance and lays the foundation for future developments toward joint modelling with the component method.

ce/papersVol. 8(6)
University of Salerno (IT), University of Liège (BE), Pegaso University (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 33%
Structural Load-Bearing Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.