Hunting and fishing harvest data collection: a horizon scanning exercise from the French context

Legal and societal moves increasingly lead leisure hunting and fishing practitioners to record their harvest. The total number of individuals harvested per population per year is the minimum required information to feed into demographic models and allow science‐based management. Some few schemes record more detailed data, hence allowing better‐informed decisions to be made. France has an extended list of legally harvested species and a wide variety of exploitation modes, which leads to a large number of harvest data collection schemes. This country is therefore taken as a case study to review the variety of situations and the pros and cons of each protocol. This review outlines a set of best practices that can guide future harvest data collection schemes both nationally and internationally, distinguishing basic information that is needed for minimum management from additional data that allow for more detailed knowledge. It highlights the trade‐off between using simple tools and clear protocols to encourage user participation, and the need for more detailed data to support advanced modeling techniques used for modern population and harvest management.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Wildlife Biology
Published
2026-01-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/wlb3.01485
Primary Topic
Marine and fisheries research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Hunting and fishing harvest data collection: a horizon scanning exercise from the French context

Léo Bacon, Charlotte Francesiaz, Aurélie Flesselle, Caroline PENIL et al.
Wildlife Biology
Marine and fisheries research
article

Hunting and fishing harvest data collection: a horizon scanning exercise from the French context

Léo Bacon, Charlotte Francesiaz, Aurélie Flesselle, Caroline PENIL, Betty Plaquin, Aurélie Barboiron, Cyril Éraud, Hervé Lormée, Adrien Tableau, Maxime Passerault, Julien Terraube, Kévin Le Rest, Laurent Beaulaton, Pierre Defos du Rau, Maryline Pellerin, Yoann Lechauve, Quentin Josset, Matthieu Guillemain
article en

Abstract

Legal and societal moves increasingly lead leisure hunting and fishing practitioners to record their harvest. The total number of individuals harvested per population per year is the minimum required information to feed into demographic models and allow science‐based management. Some few schemes record more detailed data, hence allowing better‐informed decisions to be made. France has an extended list of legally harvested species and a wide variety of exploitation modes, which leads to a large number of harvest data collection schemes. This country is therefore taken as a case study to review the variety of situations and the pros and cons of each protocol. This review outlines a set of best practices that can guide future harvest data collection schemes both nationally and internationally, distinguishing basic information that is needed for minimum management from additional data that allow for more detailed knowledge. It highlights the trade‐off between using simple tools and clear protocols to encourage user participation, and the need for more detailed data to support advanced modeling techniques used for modern population and harvest management.

Wildlife Biology
Institut National de Recherche pour l'Agriculture, l'Alimentation et l'Environnement (FR), French National Agency for Water and Aquatic Environments (FR), Institut de Génétique, Environnement et Protection des Plantes (FR), Fondation Pour la Recherche Sur la Biodiversité (FR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 86%
Marine and fisheries research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.