Generative AI as a Student Research Assistant: The Relationship of Academic and Research Practices in Higher Education

This study analyzes the observed patterns of Generative Artificial Intelligence (Generative AI) use by students in higher education through the lens of the sociotechnical systems (STS) theory, focusing on the academic subsystem. The empirical basis is a survey of 2083 students (3686 responses) from seven countries in Central and Eastern Europe, Central Asia, and Central Africa. Based on these data, two proxy indicators are proposed: A1, reflecting the overall academic use of Generative AI and A2, characterizing the use of Generative AI in a research context. The results show that Generative AI is widely incorporated into students’ academic activities (A1 = 79.06%), while research-oriented use remains less common (A2 = 46.66%) and varies significantly across subsamples. A joint analysis of A1 and A2, visualized as a zoned space A1–A2, reveals different configurations of academic practices: from a predominance of routine educational use to a more pronounced focus on research tasks. Cross-country comparisons show that in certain contexts (e.g., Kazakhstan and one of the Ukrainian subsamples), Generative AI is more often used in a research context, while in other cases, its use remains predominantly educational and routine. In this sense, the results indicate that Generative AI is beginning to fulfill the role of an emerging student research assistant in students’ academic life: technology has already become a familiar tool for completing educational tasks, but its use in supporting research activities remains fragmented. The proposed model and proxy indicators allow us to describe and compare current configurations of Generative AI use in the academic subsystem. The obtained results provide a basis for further research aimed at a deeper understanding of the factors determining the inclusion of Generative AI in student research practice, as well as for the development of management approaches regarding its use in higher education.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sci
Published
2026-01-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/sci8010024
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Generative AI as a Student Research Assistant: The Relationship of Academic and Research Practices in Higher Education

WALERY OKULICZ-KOZARYN
Sci
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
article

Generative AI as a Student Research Assistant: The Relationship of Academic and Research Practices in Higher Education

WALERY OKULICZ-KOZARYN
article en

Abstract

This study analyzes the observed patterns of Generative Artificial Intelligence (Generative AI) use by students in higher education through the lens of the sociotechnical systems (STS) theory, focusing on the academic subsystem. The empirical basis is a survey of 2083 students (3686 responses) from seven countries in Central and Eastern Europe, Central Asia, and Central Africa. Based on these data, two proxy indicators are proposed: A1, reflecting the overall academic use of Generative AI and A2, characterizing the use of Generative AI in a research context. The results show that Generative AI is widely incorporated into students’ academic activities (A1 = 79.06%), while research-oriented use remains less common (A2 = 46.66%) and varies significantly across subsamples. A joint analysis of A1 and A2, visualized as a zoned space A1–A2, reveals different configurations of academic practices: from a predominance of routine educational use to a more pronounced focus on research tasks. Cross-country comparisons show that in certain contexts (e.g., Kazakhstan and one of the Ukrainian subsamples), Generative AI is more often used in a research context, while in other cases, its use remains predominantly educational and routine. In this sense, the results indicate that Generative AI is beginning to fulfill the role of an emerging student research assistant in students’ academic life: technology has already become a familiar tool for completing educational tasks, but its use in supporting research activities remains fragmented. The proposed model and proxy indicators allow us to describe and compare current configurations of Generative AI use in the academic subsystem. The obtained results provide a basis for further research aimed at a deeper understanding of the factors determining the inclusion of Generative AI in student research practice, as well as for the development of management approaches regarding its use in higher education.

SciVol. 8(1)
Narxoz University (KZ), Humanitas University in Sosnowiec (PL)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 82%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.