Ultimate Resistance of Nickel‐free Stainless Steel T‐stubs under Static Loading

Abstract A newly developed nickel‐free, high strength austenitic stainless steel (EN 1.4678) offers excellent ductility and corrosion resistance. While its primary use is in automotive applications, its superior mechanical properties, combined with its affordability, make it an attractive material for structural applications such as structural connections which require both high strength and ductility. This paper reports, for the first time, structural tests of T‐stubs made of grade EN 1.4678 under static loading conditions. Tests on similar specimens made of conventional austenitic stainless steel EN 1.4307 and carbon steel S355 are reported for comparison. A total of 8 tests are reported, and the effects of varying the T‐stub flange material, bolt grade, and bolt spacing are investigated. All carbon steel T‐stubs failed due to fracture of the flange material, whilst for all hybrid carbon‐stainless steel T‐stubs failure was ultimately due to fracture of the bolts, due to the superior ductility of stainless steel over carbon steel. The obtained test results are compared with the design specifications for equivalent T‐stubs in tension in Eurocode 3, and cases where the specifications are inaccurate or potentially unsafe are highlighted.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ce/papers
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/cepa.70172
Primary Topic
Structural Load-Bearing Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Ultimate Resistance of Nickel‐free Stainless Steel T‐stubs under Static Loading

Marios Theofanous, Sheida Afshan, Weiran Li, Manuela Cabrera et al.
ce/papers
Structural Load-Bearing Analysis
article

Ultimate Resistance of Nickel‐free Stainless Steel T‐stubs under Static Loading

Marios Theofanous, Sheida Afshan, Weiran Li, Manuela Cabrera, Samir Dirar
article en

Abstract

Abstract A newly developed nickel‐free, high strength austenitic stainless steel (EN 1.4678) offers excellent ductility and corrosion resistance. While its primary use is in automotive applications, its superior mechanical properties, combined with its affordability, make it an attractive material for structural applications such as structural connections which require both high strength and ductility. This paper reports, for the first time, structural tests of T‐stubs made of grade EN 1.4678 under static loading conditions. Tests on similar specimens made of conventional austenitic stainless steel EN 1.4307 and carbon steel S355 are reported for comparison. A total of 8 tests are reported, and the effects of varying the T‐stub flange material, bolt grade, and bolt spacing are investigated. All carbon steel T‐stubs failed due to fracture of the flange material, whilst for all hybrid carbon‐stainless steel T‐stubs failure was ultimately due to fracture of the bolts, due to the superior ductility of stainless steel over carbon steel. The obtained test results are compared with the design specifications for equivalent T‐stubs in tension in Eurocode 3, and cases where the specifications are inaccurate or potentially unsafe are highlighted.

ce/papersVol. 8(6)
University of Sharjah (AE), University of Southampton (GB), University of Birmingham (GB)
Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 33%
Structural Load-Bearing Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Ultimate Resistance of Nickel‐free Stainless Steel T‐stubs under Static Loading — Marios Theofanous, Sheida Afshan, et al. · ce/papers (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS