Reconfiguring global LIS education: AI integration, pedagogical roles and epistemic challenges

Purpose This study aims to investigate how artificial intelligence (AI) integration is transforming library and information science (LIS) education globally, focusing on its impact on curricula, pedagogical practices and professional roles. By examining both structural patterns and lived experiences, it aims to reveal how AI reshapes the epistemic, ethical and social dimensions of LIS education in the algorithmic age. Design/methodology/approach This study adopts a multi-method approach, combining cross-national curriculum mapping of 28 LIS programmes with 25 in-depth interviews to uncover both structural patterns and lived experiences of AI integration in LIS education. A six-dimensional analytical framework is developed to assess curriculum design, pedagogical diversity and faculty alignment. This study further applies Marxist theory, phenomenology and AI ethics perspectives to interpret role shifts among educators and students, offering a nuanced understanding of the epistemic, relational and affective dynamics emerging. Findings AI integration in LIS curricula is uneven globally: North American programmes lead in technical–ethical balance, while European and Asian counterparts focus on theory or lag in formal adoption. Interviews reveal instrumental AI use dominates, causing role alienation (students as “system operators”, faculty as “technical facilitators”) and eroding reflective learning. This study highlights risks of dehumanization and fragmented cognition in AI-mediated environments. Originality/value This research uniquely applies multi-theoretical lenses to expose AI’s dual impact on LIS education: technical opportunities vs existential-pedagogical challenges. It proposes redefining LIS as cultivating “information governors” capable of critiquing algorithmic systems, advocating holistic curricula merging technical fluency, ethical reflection and humanistic inquiry. The framework and recommendations offer actionable insights for global LIS programmes to navigate AI-driven transformation responsibly.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Electronic Library
Published
2026-01-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/el-06-2025-0214
Primary Topic
Digital Humanities and Scholarship
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Reconfiguring global LIS education: AI integration, pedagogical roles and epistemic challenges

Win-Bin Huang, Y. Xing, Yangyang Wang
The Electronic Library
Digital Humanities and Scholarship
article

Reconfiguring global LIS education: AI integration, pedagogical roles and epistemic challenges

Win-Bin Huang, Y. Xing, Yangyang Wang
article en

Abstract

Purpose This study aims to investigate how artificial intelligence (AI) integration is transforming library and information science (LIS) education globally, focusing on its impact on curricula, pedagogical practices and professional roles. By examining both structural patterns and lived experiences, it aims to reveal how AI reshapes the epistemic, ethical and social dimensions of LIS education in the algorithmic age. Design/methodology/approach This study adopts a multi-method approach, combining cross-national curriculum mapping of 28 LIS programmes with 25 in-depth interviews to uncover both structural patterns and lived experiences of AI integration in LIS education. A six-dimensional analytical framework is developed to assess curriculum design, pedagogical diversity and faculty alignment. This study further applies Marxist theory, phenomenology and AI ethics perspectives to interpret role shifts among educators and students, offering a nuanced understanding of the epistemic, relational and affective dynamics emerging. Findings AI integration in LIS curricula is uneven globally: North American programmes lead in technical–ethical balance, while European and Asian counterparts focus on theory or lag in formal adoption. Interviews reveal instrumental AI use dominates, causing role alienation (students as “system operators”, faculty as “technical facilitators”) and eroding reflective learning. This study highlights risks of dehumanization and fragmented cognition in AI-mediated environments. Originality/value This research uniquely applies multi-theoretical lenses to expose AI’s dual impact on LIS education: technical opportunities vs existential-pedagogical challenges. It proposes redefining LIS as cultivating “information governors” capable of critiquing algorithmic systems, advocating holistic curricula merging technical fluency, ethical reflection and humanistic inquiry. The framework and recommendations offer actionable insights for global LIS programmes to navigate AI-driven transformation responsibly.

The Electronic LibraryVol. 44(1)
Peking University (CN)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 83%
Digital Humanities and Scholarship
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Reconfiguring global LIS education: AI integration, pedagogical roles and epistemic challenges — Win-Bin Huang, Y. Xing, et al. · The Electronic Library (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS