Stressors, Emotions and Eating: Evidence for Time‐Pressure‐Driven Snacking Rather Than Emotional Eating

Associations between stress, emotions and unhealthy eating have been reported, yet findings remain inconsistent. Stress eating and emotional eating have frequently been used interchangeably despite potential differences regarding physiological and psychological explanations. To aid in disentangling the shared and unique effects of stressors and emotions, we examined their associations with distinct aspects of eating behaviour (food craving, quantity, healthiness and snacking) in daily life in an experience-sampling study. Participants (N = 64) responded to six daily smartphone prompts over 4 weeks, reporting stressors, multidimensional emotional states (valence, arousal, calmness) and eating behaviour. Bayesian multilevel models revealed that general stressors were unrelated to snacking (OR = 1.07, 90% CI = [0.87, 1.32]), but episodes of time pressure increased snacking likelihood (OR = 1.34, 90% CI = [1.01, 1.75]) while being associated with lower food quantity (B = -2.45, 90% CI = [-4.07, -0.82]). Arousal was associated with more food intake (B = 0.04, 90% CI = [0.001, 0.087]), while there was no other emotional state-eating association. Together, these results indicate that changes in snacking behaviour are more strongly linked to specific situational constraints, such as time pressure, than to momentary emotional fluctuations. Emotional eating, operationalised as emotion-driven snacking independent of stressors, received little support in this sample. These findings suggest that interventions may benefit from targeting situational constraints, such as time pressure.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Stress and Health
Published
2026-01-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/smi.70143
Primary Topic
Eating Disorders and Behaviors
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Stressors, Emotions and Eating: Evidence for Time‐Pressure‐Driven Snacking Rather Than Emotional Eating

Jens Blechert, Julia Reichenberger, Christoph Bamberg
Stress and Health
Eating Disorders and Behaviors
article

Stressors, Emotions and Eating: Evidence for Time‐Pressure‐Driven Snacking Rather Than Emotional Eating

Jens Blechert, Julia Reichenberger, Christoph Bamberg
article en

Abstract

Associations between stress, emotions and unhealthy eating have been reported, yet findings remain inconsistent. Stress eating and emotional eating have frequently been used interchangeably despite potential differences regarding physiological and psychological explanations. To aid in disentangling the shared and unique effects of stressors and emotions, we examined their associations with distinct aspects of eating behaviour (food craving, quantity, healthiness and snacking) in daily life in an experience-sampling study. Participants (N = 64) responded to six daily smartphone prompts over 4 weeks, reporting stressors, multidimensional emotional states (valence, arousal, calmness) and eating behaviour. Bayesian multilevel models revealed that general stressors were unrelated to snacking (OR = 1.07, 90% CI = [0.87, 1.32]), but episodes of time pressure increased snacking likelihood (OR = 1.34, 90% CI = [1.01, 1.75]) while being associated with lower food quantity (B = -2.45, 90% CI = [-4.07, -0.82]). Arousal was associated with more food intake (B = 0.04, 90% CI = [0.001, 0.087]), while there was no other emotional state-eating association. Together, these results indicate that changes in snacking behaviour are more strongly linked to specific situational constraints, such as time pressure, than to momentary emotional fluctuations. Emotional eating, operationalised as emotion-driven snacking independent of stressors, received little support in this sample. These findings suggest that interventions may benefit from targeting situational constraints, such as time pressure.

Stress and HealthVol. 42(1)
University of Salzburg (AT), Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (DE)
Austrian Science Fund
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 82%
Eating Disorders and Behaviors
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.