An updated review on landfill leachate treatment methods

Abstract This review article analyses the landfill leachate treatment technologies with a focus on their environmental footprint, removal efficiencies, and economic viability. Current reviews do not seem to have an integrated comparison across technical, environmental, and economic aspects. Herein, for the first time, life cycle assessment, cost, and pollutant removal data are combined to compare both conventional and hybrid technologies. The hybrid processes like powdered activated carbon with Fenton (99% removal of colour and COD) and Fenton with activated sludge (removal of more than 78% of COD, BOD₅, DOC, NH₄+–N, and TP) showed the highest removal efficiencies. The least environment penetrating treatments are biological, and the most energy-efficient were pipe freeze crystallization (171 kWh/ton ice) and activated sludge (as low as $0.082/m3 and 0.3–65 kWh/m3). The integration of advanced oxidation with biological treatment offers the most economical method ($0.47/m3). The originality of this review is its quantitative life cycle, economic, and technical comparison with a holistic view and take-home advice for sustainable landfill leachate management.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Discover Chemistry.
Published
2026-01-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s44371-026-00473-3
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Advanced oxidation water treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
18.04
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

An updated review on landfill leachate treatment methods

Piyush Kumar Gupta, Vaibhav Sharma, Garima Nagpal, B. P. Naveen
1 citations
Discover Chemistry.
Advanced oxidation water treatment
18.04
article

An updated review on landfill leachate treatment methods

Piyush Kumar Gupta, Vaibhav Sharma, Garima Nagpal, B. P. Naveen
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract This review article analyses the landfill leachate treatment technologies with a focus on their environmental footprint, removal efficiencies, and economic viability. Current reviews do not seem to have an integrated comparison across technical, environmental, and economic aspects. Herein, for the first time, life cycle assessment, cost, and pollutant removal data are combined to compare both conventional and hybrid technologies. The hybrid processes like powdered activated carbon with Fenton (99% removal of colour and COD) and Fenton with activated sludge (removal of more than 78% of COD, BOD₅, DOC, NH₄+–N, and TP) showed the highest removal efficiencies. The least environment penetrating treatments are biological, and the most energy-efficient were pipe freeze crystallization (171 kWh/ton ice) and activated sludge (as low as $0.082/m3 and 0.3–65 kWh/m3). The integration of advanced oxidation with biological treatment offers the most economical method ($0.47/m3). The originality of this review is its quantitative life cycle, economic, and technical comparison with a holistic view and take-home advice for sustainable landfill leachate management.

Discover Chemistry.Vol. 3(1)
Responsible consumption and production
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Advanced oxidation water treatment
18.04
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.