Response of free-headed segmental piles with mechanical joints to lateral loading

Segmental piles with mechanical joints(hereinafter, mechanically-jointed piles), as an improved pile type, have been widely adopted in construction projects. Due to their structural differences from conventional single piles, their mechanical responses diverge significantly, particularly under lateral loading. Gaps form at the mechanical joint between two single pile segments in mechanically-jointed piles, amplifying distinctions in mechanical response compared to conventional piles. To investigate the mechanical behavior of mechanically-jointed piles under lateral loading, this study develops a calculation theory for mechanical response based on the *m*-method-a standard approach for conventional single piles. The theory's feasibility is validated via numerical simulations. Results indicate that numerical simulation align closely with *m*-method calculations: pile head displacement error is 4.8%, rotation error 6.2%, maximum bending moment error 24.9%, and maximum shear force error 8.2%. Comparative analysis of conventional single piles and mechanically-jointed piles with free ends reveals that under lateral loading, mechanically-jointed piles exhibit approximately 30% larger pile head displacement and approximately 55% greater rotation than conventional piles, indicating reduced deformation resistance. However, the results indicate that the mechanically-jointed pile can effectively reduce the maximum bending moment in the pile shaft. This reduction suggests a potential for optimizing the pile design and enhancing its lateral resistance performance under certain conditions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2026-01-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-36214-w
Primary Topic
Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Mechanics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Response of free-headed segmental piles with mechanical joints to lateral loading

Jingsheng Cheng, Chuanzhi Sun, Tao Liu, Qunqun Zhang et al.
Scientific Reports
Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Mechanics
article

Response of free-headed segmental piles with mechanical joints to lateral loading

Jingsheng Cheng, Chuanzhi Sun, Tao Liu, Qunqun Zhang, Yong Wu
article en

Abstract

Segmental piles with mechanical joints(hereinafter, mechanically-jointed piles), as an improved pile type, have been widely adopted in construction projects. Due to their structural differences from conventional single piles, their mechanical responses diverge significantly, particularly under lateral loading. Gaps form at the mechanical joint between two single pile segments in mechanically-jointed piles, amplifying distinctions in mechanical response compared to conventional piles. To investigate the mechanical behavior of mechanically-jointed piles under lateral loading, this study develops a calculation theory for mechanical response based on the *m*-method-a standard approach for conventional single piles. The theory's feasibility is validated via numerical simulations. Results indicate that numerical simulation align closely with *m*-method calculations: pile head displacement error is 4.8%, rotation error 6.2%, maximum bending moment error 24.9%, and maximum shear force error 8.2%. Comparative analysis of conventional single piles and mechanically-jointed piles with free ends reveals that under lateral loading, mechanically-jointed piles exhibit approximately 30% larger pile head displacement and approximately 55% greater rotation than conventional piles, indicating reduced deformation resistance. However, the results indicate that the mechanically-jointed pile can effectively reduce the maximum bending moment in the pile shaft. This reduction suggests a potential for optimizing the pile design and enhancing its lateral resistance performance under certain conditions.

Scientific ReportsVol. 16(1)
Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (BR), China National Chemical Engineering (China) (CN), Suzhou Institute of Building Science Group (China) (CN), Yunnan Investment Group (China) (CN), China Construction Eighth Engineering Division (China) (CN), Suqian University
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 80%
Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Mechanics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.