Room to Move: Enhancing Head and Neck Radiotherapy With a Six-Degree-of-Freedom Couch

Purpose Image-guided radiation therapy (IGRT) allows for a reduction in target volume margins, but relies on accurate daily set-up. Six-degree-of-freedom couches offer rotational adjustments during alignment. Given the often large and irregular target volumes treated in head and neck (H&N) cancers, rotational errors may contribute significantly to inter-fraction variability in both target coverage and critical-structure dose. We seek to evaluate the impact of rotational adjustments on target coverage and critical-structure dose in H&N radiotherapy. Methods We reviewed 214 radiotherapy fractions for H&N cancer. Patients were treated using a six-degree-of-freedom couch that allows a maximum of ±3° of roll, pitch, and yaw, in addition to linear shifts. Daily couch adjustments were recorded, and the CT simulation images and treatment plan were imported into the oncology management system to allow fusion. The delivered dose was recalculated with and without rotational components, with deviation thresholds for planning target volume (PTV) V70Gy coverage taken to be 3% and 5%. Results A rotational shift in at least one plane was used on 212 of 214 treatment fractions. Without rotational shifts, PTV V100% was lower by a median of 1.97% (1.77%-2.18%; 95% CI) compared to the planned coverage. Specifically, 43 (20%) fractions had a decrease in PTV V100% of ≥3% when rotational shifts were not applied, and 10 (4.7%) fractions had a decrease in PTV V100% of ≥5%. All 43 fractions with a ≥3% drop in PTV coverage required at least 1.5° rotational correction in at least one direction. Organs at risk (OAR) dose was less dependent on rotational correction, without significant correlations between the magnitude of rotational correction and increased OAR dose. Conclusion Rotational corrections are applied frequently when treating H&N cancers on a six-degree-of-freedom couch. Rotational adjustments had the greatest benefit on PTV coverage, while OAR doses were less dependent. These data highlight the utility of a six-degree-of-freedom couch for H&N radiotherapy and suggest a target set-up goal of less than 1.5° rotational error in all planes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cureus
Published
2026-01-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.102140
Primary Topic
Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Room to Move: Enhancing Head and Neck Radiotherapy With a Six-Degree-of-Freedom Couch

Mihir Karande, Joseph Panetta, Alexander Lukez, Thomas J Galloway et al.
Cureus
Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques
article

Room to Move: Enhancing Head and Neck Radiotherapy With a Six-Degree-of-Freedom Couch

Mihir Karande, Joseph Panetta, Alexander Lukez, Thomas J Galloway, Peter L Lee
article en

Abstract

Purpose Image-guided radiation therapy (IGRT) allows for a reduction in target volume margins, but relies on accurate daily set-up. Six-degree-of-freedom couches offer rotational adjustments during alignment. Given the often large and irregular target volumes treated in head and neck (H&N) cancers, rotational errors may contribute significantly to inter-fraction variability in both target coverage and critical-structure dose. We seek to evaluate the impact of rotational adjustments on target coverage and critical-structure dose in H&N radiotherapy. Methods We reviewed 214 radiotherapy fractions for H&N cancer. Patients were treated using a six-degree-of-freedom couch that allows a maximum of ±3° of roll, pitch, and yaw, in addition to linear shifts. Daily couch adjustments were recorded, and the CT simulation images and treatment plan were imported into the oncology management system to allow fusion. The delivered dose was recalculated with and without rotational components, with deviation thresholds for planning target volume (PTV) V70Gy coverage taken to be 3% and 5%. Results A rotational shift in at least one plane was used on 212 of 214 treatment fractions. Without rotational shifts, PTV V100% was lower by a median of 1.97% (1.77%-2.18%; 95% CI) compared to the planned coverage. Specifically, 43 (20%) fractions had a decrease in PTV V100% of ≥3% when rotational shifts were not applied, and 10 (4.7%) fractions had a decrease in PTV V100% of ≥5%. All 43 fractions with a ≥3% drop in PTV coverage required at least 1.5° rotational correction in at least one direction. Organs at risk (OAR) dose was less dependent on rotational correction, without significant correlations between the magnitude of rotational correction and increased OAR dose. Conclusion Rotational corrections are applied frequently when treating H&N cancers on a six-degree-of-freedom couch. Rotational adjustments had the greatest benefit on PTV coverage, while OAR doses were less dependent. These data highlight the utility of a six-degree-of-freedom couch for H&N radiotherapy and suggest a target set-up goal of less than 1.5° rotational error in all planes.

CureusVol. 18(1)
Fox Chase Cancer Center (US), University of Vermont Medical Center (US), Mass General Brigham (US)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 80%
Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.