Experimental evidence that penis size, height, and body shape influence assessment of male sexual attractiveness and fighting ability in humans

Why the human penis is unusually large compared to that of other primates is a long-standing evolutionary question. Sexual selection, through female mate choice and male-male competition, is a likely driver, but confirming this is difficult due to natural covariation among traits. The solution is to experimentally manipulate focal traits to identify targets of selection. Using 343 computer-generated male figures that varied in penis size, height and body shape, we experimentally tested how these traits influence perceived attractiveness and fighting ability. Over 800 participants-both male and female-viewed either life-sized (in-person) or scaled (online) animations and rated the figures. Across both settings, selection analyses revealed consistent directional selection favoring taller men with a more V-shaped body and a larger penis. In both surveys, male participants rated rivals with a larger penis as more sexually competitive and physically threatening. To our knowledge, this is the first experimental evidence that males assess rivals' fighting ability and attractiveness to females based partly on a rival's penis size. Our findings suggest that female choice and male-male competition have jointly favored larger penis size, greater height, and more V-shaped bodies in men.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PLoS Biology
Published
2026-01-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3003595
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
128.03

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Experimental evidence that penis size, height, and body shape influence assessment of male sexual attractiveness and fighting ability in humans

Khandis R. Blake, Brian S. Mautz, C. Suan Tan, Upama Aich et al.
3 citations
PLoS Biology
Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
128.03
article

Experimental evidence that penis size, height, and body shape influence assessment of male sexual attractiveness and fighting ability in humans

Khandis R. Blake, Brian S. Mautz, C. Suan Tan, Upama Aich, Bob B. M. Wong, Jacob C Kuek, Rebecca Bathgate, Robert C S Capp, Michael D Jennions
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Why the human penis is unusually large compared to that of other primates is a long-standing evolutionary question. Sexual selection, through female mate choice and male-male competition, is a likely driver, but confirming this is difficult due to natural covariation among traits. The solution is to experimentally manipulate focal traits to identify targets of selection. Using 343 computer-generated male figures that varied in penis size, height and body shape, we experimentally tested how these traits influence perceived attractiveness and fighting ability. Over 800 participants-both male and female-viewed either life-sized (in-person) or scaled (online) animations and rated the figures. Across both settings, selection analyses revealed consistent directional selection favoring taller men with a more V-shaped body and a larger penis. In both surveys, male participants rated rivals with a larger penis as more sexually competitive and physically threatening. To our knowledge, this is the first experimental evidence that males assess rivals' fighting ability and attractiveness to females based partly on a rival's penis size. Our findings suggest that female choice and male-male competition have jointly favored larger penis size, greater height, and more V-shaped bodies in men.

PLoS BiologyVol. 24(1)
Australian National University (AU), The University of Melbourne (AU), The University of Western Australia (AU), Stellenbosch University (ZA), Monash University (AU)
Monash University, National Cancer Institute
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
128.03
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.